Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xp38

Refusing to show up was really his only option if he felt the whole thing was a fraud.


77 posted on 03/03/2021 1:19:15 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

If he doesn’t show up, the President pro tempore of the United States Senate stands up and opens the certificates. Zero net effect.


92 posted on 03/03/2021 1:31:13 PM PST by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
No, making a massive spectacle and calling attention to the fact that it was blatant vote fraud was his only option.

If he said, "These states had fraudulent votes and I will not accept them as valid", people would have screamed and the entire media hate machine would have been unleashed on him, but what then would have happened?

If they count the votes without his consent, you get a constitutional crises, because that is clearly a violation.

It would have attracted necessary attention to the issue, and it would have put a proper taint on this government if he got overruled somehow by the rest of the Senate.

It would have put an asterisk in the history books about how the election was regarded as fraudulent.

And it might even possibly have attracted enough attention that it gets fixed.

135 posted on 03/03/2021 2:17:38 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson