Posted on 02/19/2021 4:46:05 PM PST by VictimsRightsPro2a
CPRC’s Nikki Goeser, author of “Stalked and Defenseless: How Gun Control Helped My Stalker Murder My Husband in Front of Me” speaks with a panel of Legislators and IFC about the tragedy she experienced as her husband, Ben, was gunned down in front of her in a “Gun Free Zone” by a man who was stalking her. Iowa Representatives Steve Holt and Matt Windschitl, along with Iowa Senator Jason Schultz, join IFC Chairman, Michael Ware, to learn Nikki’s story and consider the truth about “Gun Free Zones” and how they ultimately hurt us all. Nikki is a surviving victim of violent crime. Listen to this dialogue and consider thoroughly what the implications are when we take from people their personal choice to self-defense.
(Excerpt) Read more at crimeresearch.org ...
it’s almost as if “gun free zones” are similar to chum in shark waters. It is a catalyst for action in the form of violence.
Anecdotal evidence. Meaningless. Usually it’s cryers for hire on the antigun side. “Boo hoo I was shot by a gun in the hands of a criminal therefore we must disarm the law abiding. “ sort of merde. No better when our side does it.
Disarm yourself at your own peril.
Its not about protection of the people. It is about protection FROM the people
Tell us, oh "supposed wise one". What kind of evidence should our side use to counter the leftist anti-gun crowd, if not actual, true crimes? Are we supposed to just shut up?
Anecdotal evidence can be absolutely true as I’m sure it is in This case, but you should never base policy or law on it because you can always find an incident that supports any position - your position or the opposite position. It serves solely to inflame emotions as evidenced by your wild overreacting to a reasonable post criticizing anecdotal evidence. Try engaging your brain before your mouth/fingers
Anecdotal evidence can be absolutely true as I’m sure it is in This case, but you should never base policy or law on it because you can always find an incident that supports any position - your position or the opposite position. It serves solely to inflame emotions as evidenced by your wild overreacting to a reasonable post criticizing anecdotal evidence. Try engaging your brain before your mouth/fingers
Fight fire with fire.
I could not disagree with you more and suspect that you yourself do nothing to help our cause. I challenge you to to say what you will do to support the second ammendment besides attempting to silence voices such as these!
Sorry blow hard I lobbied the state legislature in person for years spent some time testifying in front of committees more time listening to what went on. committee saw lots of anectodal evidence none of it meaningful. What do you do besides type merde ?
The GUN is NOT the problem:
The mentally unhinged are the PROBLEM.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.