[JWNM]

By failing to address blatant voter fraud, I believe the SCOTUS will punt on this as well. Will likely refuse to hear arguments and push it to the states.

[who knows what evil?]

Don’t like guns? Move to Massachusetts. :-)

[brownsfan]

“By failing to address blatant voter fraud, I believe the SCOTUS will punt on this as well. Will likely refuse to hear arguments and push it to the states.”

You would think this would be something important, and right in their wheel house. But I agree, the SCOTUS seems to have decided that their role is to agree with the ruling party, and protect Democrats no matter which party is in control.

[glimmerman70]

I think your right. Or they will actually do there jobs this time to not lose any more credibility. Doing what biden wants for gun control is likely impossible. Wanting to ban buying guns,ammo, or parts online would put a crimp in some big money people’s pockets.

[gundog]

Won’t do interState disputes or Bill of Rights violations. What the he’ll do we need them for?

[OldGoatCPO]

SCOTUS has agreed to hear oral arguments on cases out of AZ involving ballot harvesting.

[old-ager]

> push it to the states

That would be perfect.

[hillarys cankles]

Personally, I don’t care how they get gun control through. Means NOTHING to me.

[familyop]

"...I believe the SCOTUS will punt on this as well. Will likely refuse to hear arguments and push it to the states."

The Supremes are *not* likely to punt on some of the uglier gun control legislation ahead. They'll probably decide against at least some of it. There are now five originalist justices who will defend the Second Amendment. That's why the Democrats have been threatening to stack the Supreme Court.

Just have a look at this from one of those justices, and he was appointed by George W. Bush.

Samuel Alito
Wikipedia
[Excerpt:]

Notable opinions...
Federalism

"A dissenting opinion in United States v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 1996), arguing that a U.S. law banning private citizens from owning submachine guns was similar to one struck down by the Supreme Court in United States v. Lopez and thus outside the authority of Congress under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution."

---------------------

Biden *might* get away with stopping some imports, but we can't even be sure about that.

[familyop]

What we might see coming out of this will be some class-based gun control, and many people without any class (mostly Democrats: dope smokers and the like) will be further barred from having firearms and watched more closely.

A modest proposal:

Because of the way Democrats want to play, Republican lobbyists and legislators should push for allowing some gun control for urban residents while stopping attempts to control rural and small town residents...and maybe some suburban residents in more conservative, law-abiding neighborhoods.

See how they like them apples. ;)

The new laws could be repealed or otherwise reversed, when Republicans take the White House and houses of Congress again in an election.

[unread]

"By failing to address blatant voter fraud, I believe the SCOTUS will punt on this as well."

I agree.. It seems our justice system has completely collapsed.. The gangs of thugs and the past election are good indicators of what's in store for us in the future...