Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Norway wealth fund tells firms: put more women on your boards
Reuters ^ | February 15, 2021 | By Gwladys Fouche

Posted on 02/15/2021 6:26:33 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

OSLO - Norway’s $1.3 trillion sovereign wealth fund, the world’s largest, wants the companies it invests in globally to boost the number of women on their boards and to consider setting targets if fewer than 30% of their directors are female, top fund officials told Reuters.

Boards where either gender has less than 30% representation should consider setting targets for gender diversity and report on progress, the fund said in a position paper shared with Reuters ahead of its publication later on Monday.

“We may phrase it politely, but it is pretty clear what we think,” Chief Executive Nicolai Tangen said in an interview.

“Diversity is good for the board because it brings better perspective, it is better for decision-making and increasingly important for the legitimacy of companies,” said Smith Ihenacho.

“It (a lack of female representation) could also be a red flag, that a company does not have a good process to recruit the best director.”

In 2003 Norway became the first country in the world to impose a gender quota, requiring nearly 500 firms, including 175 firms listed on the Oslo bourse, to raise the proportion of women on their boards to 40%.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: europe; finance; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2021 6:26:34 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Men on boards should just declare they are women.

Problem solved.


2 posted on 02/15/2021 6:29:02 AM PST by 2banana (Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Just have some of the board members identify as “female.” By today’s standards sexual identity cannot be questioned.


3 posted on 02/15/2021 6:30:08 AM PST by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Diversity is good for the board because it brings better perspective, it is better for decision-making...”

Pure speculation.


4 posted on 02/15/2021 6:30:42 AM PST by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What for? Japan tells us they talk too much in meetings. :)


6 posted on 02/15/2021 6:31:49 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
As well, these folks sound like they are discriminating against the other 55 genders!
7 posted on 02/15/2021 6:32:00 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s pretty much an established fact that companies with female board members lessen risk-taking. So if you had a new product that had some issues in the development stage...female board members would pursue delaying production of the product until it was ‘ready’.


8 posted on 02/15/2021 6:33:39 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

And that they are ‘trans-racial’. Two check boxes in one.


9 posted on 02/15/2021 6:35:13 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. N. Wolfe

We aren’t far from the same requirements ourselves here - and it is a blatant admission that half a century of affirmative action has failed miserably on gender lines (we’ve already codified that it failed on ethnic lines).

As I’ve posted ad nauseam on related threads, these policies indicate the governments that want us to treat all people as equals is officially stating they are NOT.

Imagine being the tokens inserted into those slots? I’ve seen how it works out with ethnic tokens (it doesn’t); you end up having to pay the diversity tax of a wasted salary/benefits package in addition to a real worker actually performing the tasks competently. The tokens accept this but it crushes them inside; they laugh all the way to the bank but shuffle with their eyes to the floor in the office, not understanding the big words used by their alleged “peers”...


10 posted on 02/15/2021 6:35:58 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Chicks with di##s


11 posted on 02/15/2021 6:37:02 AM PST by ronnie raygun ( Massive mistakes are made by arrogant fools; massive evils are committed by evil people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Just my experiences, but I’ve worked for giant corporations and on occasion sat in on top level meetings. I am a women and noticed how the other women, some in very powerful positions, acted in meetings. The brightest women spoke forcefully when they had meaningful input. The affirmative action womYn spoke too often, too loudly, interrupted others, contributed very little and made people uncomfortable. The really quiet females, I thought were probably the smartest, but had poor skills in public speaking and were cowed into silence. Men and women are different. Men seem to be cut out of the same cloth at the top levels.


12 posted on 02/15/2021 6:39:40 AM PST by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Women on boards?

Surf’s up in Norway!


13 posted on 02/15/2021 6:48:07 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Qualifications be damned


14 posted on 02/15/2021 6:56:36 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How insulting to women to say they can only obtain that position through a government quotas system.


15 posted on 02/15/2021 6:58:46 AM PST by jdsteel ("A Republic, Madam, if you can keep it." Sorry Ben, looks like we blew it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Personally, I have zero problem with the notion that women should be on the Board of Directors of a company. I have worked for women in my career. I have worked in woman-owned companies. The best of women are just as good as men.

Now for the problem: there are damn few women who choose to work to excel in the position. For some large fraction of women, their goal is not to aggressively climb the corporate ladder. By choice. Not true for all, but enough that the "bench" is not very full.

I prefer for job positions to be filled by merit, not by quotas.

If you want more women on the Boards of Directors, you need to encourage women to do the work to earn the positions.

16 posted on 02/15/2021 7:25:43 AM PST by asinclair (Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I hate to say this because I know I'll get flamed, but you KNOW with women in charge... expect a LOT of drama, pointless bickering, pettiness, endless catty fights over unimportant issues that will cripple the organization, and complete chaos and anarchy...the very worst of everything !! How do I know this? My mother's family (and any like it) are totally dysfunctional because she had only sisters. No one got along. Also.... for 15 years I worked in an office with NO males. Any who were hired never got past the probationary term. They got hounded OUT or else they left.
17 posted on 02/15/2021 7:48:53 AM PST by SMARTY (“If you have ten thousand regulations, you destroy all respect for the law.” Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sorry, Olde, that’s not the type of women they want anywhere near power.


18 posted on 02/15/2021 8:03:53 AM PST by BobL (TheDonald.win is now Patriots.win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

“What for? Japan tells us they talk too much in meetings.”

Yea, and I hope that guy apologizes for listening to the Leftists and leaving their Olympic Committee. No one should be punished for telling the truth, even if it’s painful to some portion of society (you know, the ones who never stop complaining).


19 posted on 02/15/2021 8:05:36 AM PST by BobL (TheDonald.win is now Patriots.win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Goes to show, Affirmative Action isn’t only about skin color.

Wonder how those ladies feel about being put in place as tokens? It has to be present in their minds.


20 posted on 02/15/2021 8:26:29 AM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson