Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnotherUnixGeek

That only works if the video is available unedited to the public on demand.
In many jurisdictions that is not the case.


6 posted on 02/10/2021 10:07:38 AM PST by Kozak (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak; AnotherUnixGeek
In many jurisdictions that is not the case.

You can thank police unions for that.

8 posted on 02/10/2021 10:10:12 AM PST by Mr.Unique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak

“That only works if the video is available unedited to the public on demand.
In many jurisdictions that is not the case.”


A local police department (rather small) said that such a requirement would entail the indefinite storage of videos and the hiring of a staff to maintain them. In addition videos would show people not charged with any crime thus making videos with them in it a violation of their right to privacy. As a result, they stopped using cameras on officers.

Not saying they were right or wrong. This is what they claimed.


22 posted on 02/10/2021 10:40:20 AM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson