Posted on 02/02/2021 10:20:53 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Senate Republicans will call in the FBI to testify in former President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial if Democrats open “a can of worms” by calling witnesses, Sen. Lindsey Graham warned.
Speaking to Fox News in an interview Monday evening, Graham (R-SC) made the remarks while criticizing impeachment proceedings against the former commander-in-chief.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Since 2016, what threat has Graham made that he actually carried out? I can’t think of a single one.
Oh yeah, just like we got to call any witnesses that we wanted last time too, right? Oh wait, no we didn’t
Linda the toothless chihuahua.
Lindsey “All Hat, No Cattle” Graham.
He seems foolish enough to believe the FBI would add any credibility or reliable info in a trial.
The “new” FBI, sans credibility, is now a liability to any proceeding. They are no longer a fact first organization. They are politics first.
Most of the time bs. Never
In the infamous words of Bob Dornan’s wife, shut up, ___.
Graham is a little yappy dog. Lots of bark and no bite.
Des he actually deliver that much pork back to South Carolina ? Its hard to imagine even a coruppt reason to keep him around.
Democrats are certainly shaking. “Did Graham say something?”
“Nah! Carry on.”
We had the chance this past election to be done with him BUT as usual voted the lesser of two evils IF we are going to get rid of these ASSHATS it may mean giving the Dems the seat for ONE term!!!
And Leahy will deny the requests and deny admission of any exculpatory evidence.
This country is on fire and what do they do?
They put on a useless show trial as the world looks on.
They’re just throwing fuel to the flames.
Fools, useless fools!
‘
The House Dems denied every single Trump witness during the first Impeachment.
The Republican Senate followed them up and denied Trump the witnesses he requested.
‘
They are all talk and no action. Meanwhile, Trump, in his speeches, made fun of “talk” (as far as I’m concerned) in the way he talked, but was all action.
That’s why I didn’t like him before he was elected, but loved him after.
Couldn’t they get witnesses that haven’t been so discredited?
I know and that’s the problem.
He has to be dealt with in the primary.
If it can’t be done then he has to be tolerated in the general.
I am surmising that there is a SC GOP machine that supports him. What do they get out of it? He give them that much pork?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.