Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

77 Days: Trump's Campaign to Subvert the Election
The New York Times via SF Gate ^ | January 31, 2021 | by Jim Rutenberg, Jo Becker, Eric Lipton, Maggie Haberman, Jonathan Martin, Matthew Rosenberg and Mi

Posted on 02/01/2021 5:18:24 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

By Thursday the 12th of November, President Donald Trump’s election lawyers were concluding that the reality he faced was the inverse of the narrative he was promoting in his comments and on Twitter. There was no substantial evidence of election fraud and there were nowhere near enough “irregularities” to reverse the outcome in the courts.

Thursday the 12th was the day Trump’s flimsy, long-shot legal effort to reverse his loss turned into something else entirely — an extralegal campaign to subvert the election, rooted in a lie so convincing to some of his most devoted followers that it made the deadly Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol almost inevitable.

Weeks later, Trump is the former President Trump. In coming days, a presidential transition like no other will be dissected when he stands trial in the Senate on an impeachment charge of “incitement of insurrection.” Yet his lie of an election stolen by corrupt and evil forces lives on in a divided America.

A New York Times examination of the 77 democracy-bending days between election and inauguration shows how, with conspiratorial belief rife in a country ravaged by pandemic, a lie that Trump had been grooming for years finally overwhelmed the Republican Party and, as brake after brake fell away, was propelled forward by new and more radical lawyers, political organizers, financiers and the surround-sound right-wing media.

In the aftermath of that broken afternoon at the Capitol, a picture has emerged of entropic forces coming together on Trump’s behalf in an ad hoc, yet calamitous, crash of rage and denial.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2020; journalism; media; press
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2021 5:18:24 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
There was no substantial evidence of election fraud and there were nowhere near enough “irregularities” to reverse the outcome in the courts.

How have all of the leftists and liberal talking heads determined this BEFORE there has been a thorough investigation? Huh?

2 posted on 02/01/2021 5:20:33 AM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The fear just jumps right out of this article.


3 posted on 02/01/2021 5:25:09 AM PST by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There were serious constitutional irregularities leading up to the election and that is a fact. These irregularities were never heard by the Supreme Court due to standing issues. Basically the Supreme court wanted no part in overturning an election even if it would have been justified.


4 posted on 02/01/2021 5:26:19 AM PST by ProudDeplorable (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
There was no substantial evidence of election fraud and there were nowhere near enough “irregularities” to reverse the outcome in the courts.


Nor was there any evidence this was a fair election; media disinformation campaign. They all used the same statement.
5 posted on 02/01/2021 5:26:57 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (I do not regret my decision to cut all ties with Fox News. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And they still so desperately want us to believe that Joe Biden - JOE BIDEN - is the most popular president in U.S. history.

What a joke.


6 posted on 02/01/2021 5:35:13 AM PST by cld51860 (Volo pro veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

7... SEVEN so called ADULTS to write this...SEVEN!!


7 posted on 02/01/2021 5:36:14 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

It’s like you took the actual story of the Democrats’ reaction to Trump’s 2016 win and just switched the names. Then the whole article is just about true.


8 posted on 02/01/2021 5:41:17 AM PST by _longranger81 (God help us, Every One. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And once more, the NYT tries to tell us not to believe our lying eyes...

The FRAUD in this election was EPIC and they did nothing to hide it, knowing there would be no consequences for them- esp. coming from the RINOs. And why did they sit on their hands? Because they are as big a group in the swamp as any ( I’m looking at YOU, McConnell, Cheney, Kinsinger). They have a sweet deal going on up there in DC and don’t want the Patriot wing or the people interfering with it.


9 posted on 02/01/2021 5:47:14 AM PST by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Did the NYT really look at the data and analysis before dismissing it as lies?


10 posted on 02/01/2021 5:47:26 AM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
There was no substantial evidence of election fraud and there were nowhere near enough “irregularities” to reverse the outcome in the courts.

No, of course not - not to a journalism major anyway. Those of us with math degrees know what beyond a reasonable doubt really means. (e.g. here)

Maybe the good journalist would argue for a court to hear some evidence instead of disqualifying everyone who has the temerity to bring the question.

ML/NJ

11 posted on 02/01/2021 5:47:37 AM PST by ml/nj (DITCH MITCH !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There was no substantial evidence of election fraud “

Yeah? Name one agency that looked at the evidence.


12 posted on 02/01/2021 5:50:33 AM PST by TalBlack (We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hard pass...


13 posted on 02/01/2021 5:59:19 AM PST by subterfuge (RIP T.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Goebbels, of an earlier Socialist regime’, maintained that if those in power/perceived authority tell a lie often enough the people will accept it. This is true.
So, one proper response is to deny the lie on every occasion. Don’t have to disprove, just point out that “THEY” benefit by the lie and have not allowed anyone to dispute it — in court.
Just say “No”. Call BS. Don’t look away or hunker down. Maintain that “THEY” have to prove that the election was not stolen. After all, “THEY” are the ones that benefit by the lie. “THEY” need to defend their position.
“I’m listening.” “Go ahead.”


14 posted on 02/01/2021 6:06:21 AM PST by bobbo666 (lies lies lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It take seven (!) people to make up this propaganda piece.

I sent them this link....though they probably already know about it.

https://hereistheevidence.com


15 posted on 02/01/2021 6:09:49 AM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Subvert the stolen election


16 posted on 02/01/2021 6:10:09 AM PST by ronnie raygun ( Massive mistakes are made by arrogant fools; massive evils are committed by evil people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They never disproved anything


17 posted on 02/01/2021 6:16:28 AM PST by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobbo666

“one proper response is to deny the lie on every occasion. Don’t have to disprove, just point out that “THEY” benefit by the lie and have not allowed anyone to dispute it — in court. Just say “No”. Call BS. Don’t look away or hunker down. Maintain that “THEY” have to prove that the election was not stolen. After all, “THEY” are the ones that benefit by the lie. “THEY” need to defend their position. “I’m listening.” “Go ahead.””

Excellent.

Every time I see these Election Fraud Deniers spout these lies I mentally note that they are spouting their leftist propaganda “WITHOUT EVIDENCE” (one of their favorite phrases).


18 posted on 02/01/2021 6:25:38 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: virgil

Did the NYT really look at the data and analysis before dismissing it as lies?
...........................................
Of course they did, but surely you don’t think the fact that it did, and that it was fully aware of the hundreds of election law violations, would sidetrack its agenda to help get that fool elected, do you?


19 posted on 02/01/2021 6:33:51 AM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Conceding the result of a fraudulent election is both irrational and immoral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable

These weren’t constitutional irregularities. It was outright unconstitutional .


20 posted on 02/01/2021 6:44:53 AM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson