Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global warming: Facts vs. media misrepresentation
Americanthinker.com ^ | 1/27/2021 | Jack Helner

Posted on 01/27/2021 12:44:51 PM PST by rktman

With Joe Biden ramping up the greenie ideology, the history of global warming is worth another look.

All you need to know to understand that the conspiracy is false is to see that the Earth had a substantial, lengthy cooling period from 1945 to 1975.

On the first Earth Day in 1970, after 25 years of cooling, people were scared to death about dire forecasts by "experts," without any scientific data supporting their predictions, that billions would soon freeze and die of starvation because of a new ice age. The media participated in scaring the public. The predictions were 100% wrong because a little warming resumed as it always does.

By 1970, there had been around 100 years of exponential growth in oil and coal consumption, the population had risen by several hundred percent, and CO2 content had increased substantially. Cars, trucks, planes, combines, tractors, TVs, air-conditioners, furnaces, and computers had been invented. Most houses now had electricity.

Yet the Earth was cooling so much that billions would die because of cooling despite all these inventions that supposedly cause warming. A child could understand that if a significant period of cooling occurred, oil and humans did not cause warming. But the cultists don't care about facts or science when they are pushing their radical leftist agenda to destroy jobs and America.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climageddon; ecowankers; gangreen
Simple questions for your ecowanker pals:

1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.

2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.

3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.

4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.

5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.

6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.

7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.

1 posted on 01/27/2021 12:44:51 PM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

What is the warmists’ falsifiable hypothesis?


2 posted on 01/27/2021 12:51:11 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets ("Women's intuition" gave us the Salem witch trials and Kavanaugh hearings. Change my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I remind people all the time about how we barely survived the Ice Age of the 1970’ that was caused by pollution from burning petroleum products. Hell it didn’t really end until the early 1980’s until they decided all that pollution from burning petroleum products was really causing Global Warming. For the next 30 plus years the Global Warming remained FLAT so now we call it Climate Change.

There might be something to this Climate Change thingy, when I left my house in the mountains this Morning it was 35 degrees outside, but by the time I got to my shop near sea level it had warmed up to 48 degrees?


3 posted on 01/27/2021 12:54:36 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

It is false that man can control the cycles of the sun.


4 posted on 01/27/2021 1:12:53 PM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets; All
"What is the warmists’ falsifiable hypothesis?"

I agree 100%.

And even if the politically correct, government manufactured (imo) crisis of global warming is provable by repeatable results of scientific method-based experiments, it remains that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the corrupt, Democratic-stolen federal government the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of global warming issues.

”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

5 posted on 01/27/2021 1:13:21 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I just tuned in to an episode of a documentary series entitled “The Universe.”

This particular episode focuses on Venus, a planet that has always intrigued me because its dense cloud cover makes it such a mystery.

I should’ve guessed; as the episode wore on I learned the surface temperature on Venus is approximately 900°F due to greenhouse gases and global warming.

And guess what? If we don’t do something soon, Earth will become another Venus!

So, rather than an interesting program detailing what we know about our sister planet, I got a lecture on global warming.

6 posted on 01/27/2021 1:22:28 PM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Please use the correct name: Global warming theory.

All this nonsense over a theory, so govt can assert control over every facet of our lives


7 posted on 01/27/2021 1:34:18 PM PST by joshua c (Jan 20th is Dump Day. Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

Me, I don’t use “it” at all. 😂


8 posted on 01/27/2021 1:42:09 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Screwed, blued and tatooed. Enlisted USN 1967.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Consider...CO2 exists in our atmosphere as a TRACE had at about 615 parts per MILLION. Most CO2 comes from natural sources. CO2 is essential for life on this planet and is used as food by every green plant from single celled alge to giant redwood trees. Human activity accounts for only a few parts per million of CO2. Does it make any sense that the entire climate of the planet is hinged on a few parts per million of a single trace gas and that other factors like the variations in solar output or the wobble in the tilt of the earth’s axis relative to the sun have no effect on climate?


9 posted on 01/27/2021 1:48:56 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

415 ppm.


10 posted on 01/27/2021 2:10:55 PM PST by rfp1234 (Caveat Emperor: Comitii asinorum atque rhinocerorum delendi sunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
....'Media' ramping up Bidens greenie ideology.....


11 posted on 01/27/2021 3:07:40 PM PST by caww (“For the people” and “For the children” - signals we're about to be scammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson