[Shadylake]

That each of the parties would get around 25% and the dems 50%? Yeah, big shock.

[IrishBrigade]

;That each of the parties would get around 25% and the dems 50%? Yeah, big shock.’

shhh...

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

Would it be possible to have run-off elections for President, as they do in France and many other countries? This could be done with two actual votes (France, again) or with a single round of voting with some sort of ranked order ballot. Either way, voting proceeds until someone gets 50% +1 of the votes.

[rollo tomasi]

That each of the parties would get around 25% and the dems 50%? Yeah, big shock.

That is *positive* progress not shock simpleton.

Most voters deserve it good and hard; generations have rode the Federal debt gravy train for decades, time for an implosion and start over.

25% is a good start (Of course people can actually start to think and grow that positive 25% from actully pain from the policies of the 50% but you would rather do the insane thing while hoping for a different result from the collectivists/globalist (R's). So thus, you are insane if you think the republican party will change anything.

[Syncro]

That each of the parties would get around 25% and the dems 50%? Yeah, big shock
************

That’s the problem right there

Get a majority in the gop party and change the name to the Patriot Party

Then the PPers can come on over

Didn’t the republican party used to be the Whig party?