Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Rand Paul suggests he might boycott Trump's 'sham' impeachment trial
Daily Mail ^ | 25 Jan | By LAUREN FRUEN FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 01/25/2021 1:00:45 PM PST by RandFan

Rand Paul suggested he might boycott Trump's 'sham' impeachment because the former president is no longer in office.

In an op-ed for The Hill, titled 'boycott sham impeachment' the Republican senator wrote on Sunday: 'The first impeachment of Donald Trump in 2019 was a witch hunt filled with fabricated charges, unsupported evidence and partisan rancor disguised as legal concern.'

Arguments in the Senate trial will begin the week of February 8. If Paul were to boycott the vote the Democrats would need the support of 16 GOP Senators to convict Trump.

Paul added: 'If we are to blame politicians for the most violent acts of their craziest supporters, then many of my colleagues would face some pretty harsh charges themselves.

'I've been shot at, assaulted and harassed by supporters of the left, including some who directly said the words of politicians moved them to this violence.

'I am more than willing to work with Democrats to find common ground on protecting civil liberties or ending some of our many foreign military interventions, but no unity or common ground will be found while Democrats continue to fight the last election.

'This so-called impeachment is a farce and should be dismissed before it is even allowed to begin.'

Paul shared the piece Sunday, tweeting: 'I am more than willing to work with Democrats to find common ground on protecting civil liberties or ending some of our many foreign military interventions, but no unity or common ground will be found while Democrats continue to fight the last election.'

He had earlier appeared on ABC where he continued to refuse to admit the 2020 election was not stolen.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: impeachment; randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2021 1:00:45 PM PST by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

+


2 posted on 01/25/2021 1:01:40 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY SHOULD SKIP OUT ON THIS RIDICULOUS TRIAL...................


3 posted on 01/25/2021 1:02:25 PM PST by chopperk (Warnocdrk doesn't have a chance if Stacy sits on him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

That’s like sitting out an election and then complaining about the results. He needs to be there to vote NO.


4 posted on 01/25/2021 1:02:41 PM PST by Library Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

No - be there to acquit!

Now is NOT the time to make an ideological stand


5 posted on 01/25/2021 1:02:49 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

When will the Relpublicans impeach one or both of the Clintons?


6 posted on 01/25/2021 1:03:09 PM PST by chopperk (Warnocdrk doesn't have a chance if Stacy sits on him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

When will the Relpublicans impeach one or both of the Clintons?


7 posted on 01/25/2021 1:03:25 PM PST by chopperk (Warnocdrk doesn't have a chance if Stacy sits on him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
Conviction is based on the “members present.” I worry about Rand not being there would change the denominator.
8 posted on 01/25/2021 1:04:36 PM PST by Fido969 (,i.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
He had earlier appeared on ABC where he continued to refuse to admit the 2020 election was not stolen.

You can't admit to something that is 100% FALSE. 2020 elctions WERE stolen

9 posted on 01/25/2021 1:04:47 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Ahem. It is Schumer-Pelosi-Romney’s sham impeachment trial.

It’s as wrong as referring to Kennedyism as “Borking”. Name the villian, not the victim.


10 posted on 01/25/2021 1:05:04 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Call on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY SHOULD SKIP OUT ON THIS RIDICULOUS TRIAL...................

Except for the vote, thoroughly agree.

11 posted on 01/25/2021 1:05:07 PM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

ABCDisney never once complained that Hillary Clinton spent FOUR years calling Donald Trump’s presidency “illegitimate”.

And Clintonista Georgie Stephienoplace didn’t bring it up once.


12 posted on 01/25/2021 1:06:15 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Call on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Good for him!


13 posted on 01/25/2021 1:06:30 PM PST by Onthebrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

No. It will be a vote on 2/3 of those present, not 2/3 of the Senate. Maybe he could just show for the vote?


14 posted on 01/25/2021 1:06:39 PM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

They need 2/3s. Does this number(67) change if he boycotts. Isnt he just saying now that he is a no vote?


15 posted on 01/25/2021 1:07:16 PM PST by joshua c (Jan 20th is Dump Day. Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

There is no such thing as impeachment of a private citizen.... Call it what it is: A Banana Republic Kangaroo Court


16 posted on 01/25/2021 1:07:54 PM PST by Bulwinkle (Bulwinkke, a.k.a. Daffy Duck )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
Good for him. Trump should boycott it too if they muzzle election fraud evidence.

It's not like they could arrest him.

17 posted on 01/25/2021 1:08:08 PM PST by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY SHOULD SKIP OUT ON THIS RIDICULOUS TRIAL...................

Except for the vote, thoroughly agree.


Take it a step further...skip the vote as well..


18 posted on 01/25/2021 1:09:38 PM PST by AFret.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Boycott?! Don’t they need his vote?


19 posted on 01/25/2021 1:10:09 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk
THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY SHOULD SKIP OUT ON THIS RIDICULOUS TRIAL...................

Without a doubt, just attending gives credence to this folly.

20 posted on 01/25/2021 1:10:43 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson