There most certainly is evidence of voter irregularities, voter fraud. No one can deny that. It’s nothing new however. To any who breathlessly claim it about 2020’s election, I’d ask, in the words of John McClain, “welcome to the party pal!”
The real question is, were such irregularities, such “fraud” ENOUGH to overturn the election results? I respectfully submit, just as in previous cycles, it’s not enough. More on this (perhaps) coming in a separate post. I’m still composing it, and considering if it’s worth posting on FR in the first place.
But this shouldn’t be shocking, or “news” to anyone following along for the last 50 years. Of course there are “irregularities” and “fraud” in this election. Just like in every election in recent memory. Nothing really new there.
For a foretaste of why, again, I do not believe there is enough evidence to assert that the election was “stolen” see the following Twitter thread I’ve posted before in recent days/weeks. Does it disprove all allegations of fraud? No. But again, for anyone following along the last 40-50 years, not really much surprising, not really much of a “bombshell” to generally claim “election fraud”. Again, that’s already known. And a fact. The only question to really ask is: is such fraud ENOUGH to have overturned 2020?
https://twitter.com/JonathanTCasey/status/1342303141975515136?s=20
And speaking of Mr. Navarro specifically, one must note the footnotes 36, 49 and 52 in his first installment “The Immaculate Deception”. Readable here: https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf
The careful researcher will note that they point to court cases where, since the publishing of that first installment, such evidence was examined by the courts, “evidence” detailed in those footnotes, and found to be lacking.
Again, I’m still considering detailing this in a separate thread. But if one wishes, for now, it’s relatively easy to see this for oneself with minimal effort I’d say.