Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Epoch Times: 29 GOP Senators Oppose Trump Trial
Newsmax ^ | 25 January 2021 | Theodore Bunker

Posted on 01/25/2021 12:51:35 PM PST by Magnatron

House Democrats plan to walk the impeachment charge against former President Donald Trump to the Senate on Monday evening, but multiple members of the GOP in the Upper Chamber have already come out against holding a trial.

The Epoch Times reported Monday, 29 GOP senators have spoken out against holding a trial, arguing it is unconstitutional to try to convict a former office holder, or a waste of time.

-snip-

This is The Epoch Times' list of GOP Senators who oppose a trial:

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C. Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss. Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss. Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D. Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis. Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark. Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. Sen. John Thune, R-S.D. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn. Sen. Jodi Ernst, R-Iowa. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn. Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo. Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1621; impeachment2; impeachtrumptrial; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: DIRTYSECRET
Secret ballot won't save them - if Trump is "convicted", the GOP must be ended.
61 posted on 01/25/2021 2:30:11 PM PST by Major Matt Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
The whole thing is a farce and everyone knows it. This says more about the state of the GOP than anything else.

And Roberts too. He should preside and make a ruling that its unconstitutional and throw it out for guess what, "Lack of Standing".

62 posted on 01/25/2021 2:31:23 PM PST by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: datura
If they vote to convict, the new party must form immediately. Trump as the party leader, Pompeo runs for office in 2024.

The election to stand up and fight for just ended, Republicans lost because they would not fight, and many wouldn't fight because they hate Trump and love the swamp system they benefit from.

The GOP had its chance to save our Republic and they purposely blew it. There will be no "free and fair elections" in America's future, so you can just forget about winning the white house.

63 posted on 01/25/2021 2:31:51 PM PST by Bullish (CNN is what happens when 8th graders run a cable network.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bray

“No Mitch McConnell”

Correct.

Mitch is bought.

This GOP a lot.


64 posted on 01/25/2021 2:33:39 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

Has chief justice Roberts formally declared that he will not preside at the Senate trial? I’ve read many times that he will not do it but I wonder if it is just a “some say” type statement.


65 posted on 01/25/2021 2:48:55 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bray

And no Portman from Ohio. Just heard today he is not seeking re-election. Better watch this nutcase.


66 posted on 01/25/2021 2:50:49 PM PST by growingpains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Or rewritten the laws to make Trump guilty of “something”.


67 posted on 01/25/2021 2:51:05 PM PST by epluribus_2 (He, had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
And Roberts too. He should preside and make a ruling that its unconstitutional and throw it out for guess what, "Lack of Standing".

Trump's team should certainly petition SCOTUS to rule that it's a farce. Roberts shouldn't preside (and he won't) because that would give the proceeding an imprimatur that is not justified.

68 posted on 01/25/2021 2:51:52 PM PST by KevinB (''... and to the Banana Republic for which it stands ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

How about no due process. He did not get to defend himself inthe House.

Farce.


69 posted on 01/25/2021 2:55:14 PM PST by epluribus_2 (He, had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

They never acknowledged the most serious reason to oppose this. The idea is to drive a political opponent from office—ok, blood sport and all that. But never before has an insurgent party not only seized power but continued to hound that opponent into his private life, threatening his freedom, his family and his supporters. This is banana republic stuff. What you would expect in Chile, say, or Nicaragua.. Where the new guys criminalized the old guys and sought to put them in prison for no discernible crime. Crossing the line.


70 posted on 01/25/2021 2:57:24 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
"You make a good point, and I am a big advocate of looking to history for precedent."

which, if you actually do, shows as many successes for third parties as failures (two each). Successes...Democrats displace Federalists, Republicans displace Whigs. Failures..Bull Moose and Ross Perot. The history of the current tyranny is more like the first two than the second.

71 posted on 01/25/2021 3:04:52 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (No Longer Tolerating Trolls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

The idea of impeachment of a private citizen is ludicrous; so I have to assume the rats have deeper motives. Their idea may be that even a sham impeachment could help set the predicate for a criminal trail in the usual courts of law. In any case the floozies and scoundrels of the media will make a big deal of it however it turns out.


72 posted on 01/25/2021 3:06:00 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

We don’t have much of a 2nd party right now but, regardless, tens of millions will vote for its candidates in the next election - viable, sensible, 3rd party or not. THAT is how you split votes - and now is exactly the worst possible time in history to do that, since the Dems are utterly unconstrained by any shred of decency or the usual check of morality. They aim for nothing less than a 1-party nation...THEIR party, not ours, to be sure. Give them a landslide by splitting the vote like TR and Taft did, and you’ll swear that you’re in a Twilight Zone episode, because it’s going to feel a lot like Nazi Germany very quickly after that (and that’s if we’re lucky - it may happen before then if they get truly greedy for power, and there are signs that they are).

BTW, here’s my response of a few minutes ago to a GOP email begging me to renew my expired membership (i.e. my contributions to them):


“Yeah, well, I meant it to expire, and it is going to stay that way.

Today’s news that ONLY 29 out of 50 Republican Senators think that the 2nd impeachment of Donald J. Trump is such a complete sham that the Senate shouldn’t even hear the case. So, what happened to the other 21?

THAT is why I have left the Party, after having been a member since I started voting in 1980.

Good bye, and good riddance, you useless bunch of cucks.”


73 posted on 01/25/2021 3:08:43 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, “The Weapon Shops of Isher”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

I think you are right. After all, they impeached him in one day, no witnesses, no presentation of evidence, no defense, just gassy speeches and then a vote. A true parody of a real trial.


74 posted on 01/25/2021 3:09:39 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron; All

While we’re on the topic, here’s my response of a few minutes ago to a GOP email begging me to renew my expired “membership” (i.e. my contributions to them):


“Yeah, well, I meant it to expire, and it is going to stay that way.

Today’s news that ONLY 29 out of 50 Republican Senators think that the 2nd impeachment of Donald J. Trump is such a complete sham that the Senate shouldn’t even hear the case. So, what happened to the other 21?

THAT is why I have left the Party, after having been a member since I started voting in 1980.

Good bye, and good riddance, you useless bunch of cucks.”


75 posted on 01/25/2021 3:10:04 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, “The Weapon Shops of Isher”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
without the United States supreme Court chief justice presiding over the alleged Senate trial this whole thing is a farce.

The Constitution is very clear, "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside..." Since POTUS is not being tried, the CJ is not involved.

76 posted on 01/25/2021 3:18:00 PM PST by upchuck ("When anything gets too numerous it's likely to get hit by some plague" ~ Ish in "Earth Abides")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz
Why is this even be discussed when Chief Justice John Roberts won’t participate but is required to, constitutionally?

No, he isn't. Please see my reply #76.

77 posted on 01/25/2021 3:21:50 PM PST by upchuck ("When anything gets too numerous it's likely to get hit by some plague" ~ Ish in "Earth Abides")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Failures..Bull Moose and Ross Perot.


You are perhaps incorrect in labeling these as failure. TR had loyalty only to the ‘Progressive’ movement and to himself. Theodore Roosevelt stopped the less ‘Progressive’ Taft from re-election.
Similarly, Perot folded as soon as William Blythe ‘Clinton’ showed a lead over George H. W. Bush, which was his main objective. If Perot cared about protectionism, he would have been highly visible as an opponent of NAFTA, like Patrick Buchanan. Or maybe the enemedia just didn’t report anything Perot said or did after Bush was defeated.


78 posted on 01/25/2021 3:28:28 PM PST by bIlluminati (Defund the Left. Shrink the U.S. Federal government to 1897 levels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Even that corrupt POS Roberts is saying no!

Don't know what the CJ's comments are about this, if any. Makes no difference as he won't be involved. Please see my reply #76.

79 posted on 01/25/2021 3:34:35 PM PST by upchuck ("When anything gets too numerous it's likely to get hit by some plague" ~ Ish in "Earth Abides")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

Please see my reply #76. Thanks.


80 posted on 01/25/2021 3:36:12 PM PST by upchuck ("When anything gets too numerous it's likely to get hit by some plague" ~ Ish in "Earth Abides")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson