Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I’m no lawyer, but I thought part of the Democrat goal was to bar Trump from future office. That possible penalty is built into the Constitution, as a potential outcome of a senate trial of a president, presided over by the CJ.

If they recognize that Trump is not president, and if the CJ is not going to preside, then doesn’t this smell even more like a Bill of Attainder where a legislative body votes to punish someone?


54 posted on 01/25/2021 10:37:06 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I'm sorry the Q thing didn't work out. We were wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
ClearCase_guy @54 wrote: "... doesn’t this smell even more like a Bill of Attainder where a legislative body votes to punish someone?"

The United States Constitution. Art. 1, Sec. 9, states, "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." In Art. 1, Sec. 10, even states are forbidden from passing any Bill of Attainder.

Of course, the Demonicrats have long despised and disregarded the U.S. Constitution.

72 posted on 01/25/2021 10:47:01 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson