Posted on 01/21/2021 7:27:45 AM PST by Red Badger
President Joe Biden issued an executive order on his first day in office, mandating that any schools that receive federal funding must function as if biological males who claim to be females are the same, and vice versa, or risk losing that funding. This pro-transgender policy extends to male athletes who claim their gender identity as a female should allow them to compete on women’s teams, receive women’s scholarships, and be admitted in women’s locker rooms.
“Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports,” the executive order reads, promising that the Biden administration is committed to “prevent and combat discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation.”
Biden previously promised to pioneer a radical transgender agenda, telling the mother of an 8-year-old, gender-confused child at a town hall that he would “flat-out change the law” and eliminate former President Donald Trump’s executive orders concerning sex and gender identity. His pledge received support and encouragement from now-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
“Joe Biden said that on his first day of office, he will give transgender students access to sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms in accordance with their gender identity in all federally funded schools. Do you think he has the ability to do this, and do you agree with his decision?” a reporter asked Schumer.
“I agree with the decision, and I know he’ll check things out thoroughly, legally,” Schumer said.
During his campaign, Biden also vowed to use the Department of Education to investigate and address any violations of transgender students’ civil rights, including removing federal school funding or risking legal action. His new executive order also mandates that every agency must act to ensure the enforcement of this new rule within 100 days of Jan. 20.
Under Trump, the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights found that a Connecticut policy that allowed biologically male student-athletes who identify as female to participate in female sports violated Title IX. Democrat Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii introduced legislation in the House in December that prevents biological men from participating in female sports.
Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.
You’re right. Transgender homosexual cross-dressers.
Lol. Schools embrace Biden.
I identify as a lesbian female who likes to wear men’s clothing. Now gimme my perks. I am a double protected class.
Similarly, the stupid **** that state and local Democrat politicians have been doing in recent years certainly will.
To quote BHO's pastor, Jeremiah Wright "America's chickens are coming home to roost."
Every boy should say he’s a female just for the women’s locker experience. It’d be great if thousands overwhelmed the system. Liberal women would be going crazy.
Bruce Jenner proved men make better women athletes than women do. Now, every man’s a woman, if he claims to be one. Women’s athletics is poised for tremendous advances in world records.
Cancel culture. They are staning by with their mallet in the game of whack-a-mole.
Liberal women are already crazy.................................................
Shade of B.O.
I remember when John McEnroe caught a lot of grief for saying that Serena Williams would be ranked around 700 on the men’s tour. Television and movies show 105 lbs. women beating up 250 lbs. men almost constantly. The response to McEnroe was “What, do you think you could beat her?” He was nearly 60 when he said it. That response is simply stupid. If that is your response on these things, I have bad news for you: you’re either stupid or so emotional that you can’t think.
It doesn’t matter if Rhonda Rousey (in her prime, not now) could beat up some old and out of shape guy. She couldn’t beat the worst male MMA fighter in probably any weight class. It also doesn’t matter if Sarah Fuller can kick a football better than some blowhard on a team message board. She wasn’t the best kicker on Vanderbilt’s campus. That was an obvious publicity stunt; frankly, it was a pretty good one. You don’t ever really see “trans men” wanting to compete in men’s sports. There’s a reason for that.
If the Left wants to destroy women’s sports, and it looks like they want to, the irony is as plentiful as the tragedy. This kind of stuff is the “fundamental change” they mean. I would like to see Megan Rapinoe play against a decent male high school team. Real life isn’t like television. Meanwhile, why must women’s sports be destroyed for a handful of weirdos?
I identify as a lesbian female who likes to wear men’s clothing. Now gimme my perks. I am a double protected class.
Actually, you got a trifecta, there: Female, Lesbian, and a cross-dresser.
The women will get it eventually—but not until there are a bunch of rapes in schools in cities and towns across the land.
Some lessons just have to be learned the hard way.
Not only hogwash, but if it was a story so near and dear to his heart, why didn’t he let this story be know when he was running for the senate 10 years later????? Hmmm.
May they all end up in the cellars of the American equivalent to the Lubyanka.
Madness.
On Day One, Biden Destroys Women’s Sports
Should read Biden feeds the feral.
And now the meme’s start with “This one smells funny” featuring the male in female sports and JB.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Just as with Obama, corrupt federal lawmakers are protecting their voting records by letting Biden get away with exercising legislative powers front-ended by an unconstitutional executive order.
What’s even worse is that Congress is wrongly letting Biden breach the constitutional division of federal and state government powers by basing his anti-science executive order on stolen state powers.
More specifically, President Thomas Jefferson had clarified, in a State of the Union address, that the states would first need to appropriately amend the Constitution to give Congress the power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend for INTRAstate schooling purposes, something that the states have never done.
"On a few articles of more general and necessary use, the suppression in due season will doubtless be right, but the great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphases added].”—Thomas Jefferson : Sixth Annual Message to Congress
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In other words, the so-called “federal” funding that Biden’s E.O. is threatening the loss of if intrastate schools don’t comply with Biden’s perverted policies is arguably stolen state revenues, revenues that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Also, the only express power that the states have expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds to protect sex-related rights on the basis of sex is limited to protecting such rights in the context of voting rights issues, evidenced by the 19th Amendment (19A).
"19th Amendment:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
In fact, 19A is based on the Supreme Court's decision in Minor v. Happerset, the Court establishing the precedent of recognizing sex strictly on the basis of biological sex at birth imo.
“3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.
I'm hoping that we haven't seen the last of Trump.
Outsports, a sports news website that focuses on LGBT issues in sports, named Fox the “bravest athlete in history” in a recent article written by Cyd Zeigler. Fox, who is a biological male fighting physically weaker females and inflicting life-altering harm, apparently qualifies as brave because, according to Zeigler, “she was the target of a torrent of hatred I have literally never seen targeting an LGBTQ athlete.”
These freaks think a man who beats on women and breaks their bones is awesome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.