If this 36 page pdf report is his exhaustive report on the elections, it’s garbage. It’s so poor, he doesn’t even put his name to it anywhere and it’s dated January 6th. Today is the 13th FFS. That alone should tell you everything. There’s no supporting data, absolutely nothing we haven’t seen dozens of times in the past several weeks. If this report is the best he can muster than we don’t have a case. Period. Sorry to throw cold water on the parade. I’m really beginning to resent these people.
Well, apparently you didn't read it carefully. It's not a "report". It is a copy of 36 slides summarizing many hundreds of pages of evidence and a couple hundred sworn affidavits, most of which have been published for reviews and submitted to courts, but none of which have been legally reviewed in any court and judged for truthfulness.
The actual examination of the facts and testing (judging the truthfulness) will require considerable court time, and additional investigation to determine the actual valid election results (separating the valid data from the fraudulent data).
The slides suggest a simple, logical, and easily provable process to accomplish this.
It must be done, and soon.