Well, apparently you didn't read it carefully. It's not a "report". It is a copy of 36 slides summarizing many hundreds of pages of evidence and a couple hundred sworn affidavits, most of which have been published for reviews and submitted to courts, but none of which have been legally reviewed in any court and judged for truthfulness.
The actual examination of the facts and testing (judging the truthfulness) will require considerable court time, and additional investigation to determine the actual valid election results (separating the valid data from the fraudulent data).
The slides suggest a simple, logical, and easily provable process to accomplish this.
It must be done, and soon.
My point is there is nothing new presented. He is representing this as the results of his research which is false. Most of the info on those slides are from other sources we’ve seen many times over several weeks.. There isn’t a single new item there. No methodology, no data, zero. I don’t for buy the, “I’ve submitted a classified report with details...”. Why? So he never has to show us his data and results? I know a con when I see one. Yeah I fell for it briefly, but my stupidity wore off. I now have no doubt he is full of shit. 50+ separate countries manipulated the election as a coordinated effort in real time? Who, other than Gateway Pundit or National File believe that without any proof? We are being played! As Sleepy Joe says, Come’on man.
Three things aroused my suspicions of Jovan Pulitzer.
1. Claimed “he was in” - as in they hacked into the polling pad at a specific precinct during the GA hearing. He never provided any proof of that. No screen shot, no data, zero evidence he was able to do that.
2. Claimed he discovered and had proof in real time China was manipulating vote totals from a voting machine and sending that data to China. His proof was a pic of a wifi signal from a flat panel tv with Roku. He didn’t show data coming from a vote machine into the TV wifi. He showed nothing. Had I been in the precinct with my iPhone personal hotspot on he could have claimed I was siphoning data from a vote machine.
3. He posted photos “just discovered” by his trusted source of fraudulent ballots in a GA County warehouse being shredded that day. Problem is they were emergency ballots, were blank, and for the 11/3 election - not the January election. Also, they were all over Twitter weeks before they were supposedly “just discovered” by his source so they couldn’t have been shredded that day by trucks photographed weeks ago.
So yeah...he’s appears to be an attention seeking con artist in my opinion.