Posted on 01/11/2021 7:38:54 PM PST by DoughtyOne
This video of Professor Alfia D'Urso - Legal Council / Supreme Court of Italy, Italian Tax Court/ EU Banking Credit Foundation / Dresden Bank Securitization/ Max Planck Inst., reveals action against a military official who confessed to interferring in the U. S. November Election.
He has an affidavit regarding Aurturo Arturo D'Elia Chief Technology Offier of Leonardo SpA.
This is brief and cryptic. I thought folks needed to have access to it.
This may blow up on the Communists in the United States yet.
It comes from another nation. There was such massive fraud
it’s leaking out all over the place.
There’s plenty of evidence. It keeps rolling in
The “ there’s no evidence “ position. Is eventually going to become impossible to defend.
Thought this story was shown to be flimsy.
This guy is connected to the Italian Supreme Court.
Of course that’s if this is legit. I can’t say that
for sure, but the guy seems to have some pretty handsome
credentials, unless it’s all faked.
I don’t see a plus for the Left to push this narrative.
I hope this guy didn’t value his Twitter and YouTube accounts....
And Facebook too! LOL
We descended into complete silliness. This Italian story is as compelling as Mario Brothers but less entertaining.
Stop being so gullible people. You’ll literally believe anything FFS.
https://attivissimo.blogspot.com/2021/01/for-general-flynn-and-anyone-else-who.html
https://attivissimo.blogspot.com/2021/01/for-general-flynn-and-anyone-else-who.html?m=1
His client was arrested for corporate espionage. Now he's saying he has info on the elections. His attorney representing his words is not the same as proof. People guilty as hell will say anything.
And whats to say your link isn’t full of disinformation sh!t? Its the internet. Invented by Al Gore.
Thanks to those of you who have come in to say this has been
debunked.
I hadn’t see it to this point. It was new to me.
If this is rehashing something already settled I apologize.
But that’s not why I am saying it will not.
Even if it was genuine, which I am 99.99% certain it’s not based on the recent pattern of ‘amazing’ information that simply leads nowhere (anyone remember Delta Force shooting it out with the CIA in Frankfurt ...), as long as it remains in fringe media, blogs, podcasts and other subordinate media sources, it will be ignored. Even if it was 100% veritable, it will be ignored and not go anywhere.
I am not saying that it has to be on the ‘Mainstream Media’ for it to be true. No! What I am saying is that for it to make a difference it has to be on the Mainstream Media. ‘But what if the MSM will not report on it?’ Exactly my point - it has to be evidence SO MASSIVE that they wouldn’t have a choice to report on it.
Anything else is a waste of time. Unless the evidence is so overwhelming that not even the MSM can ignore it then that evidence will be useless. Maybe good for ‘moral relief’ but nothing more, and even if people flame me for saying that it’s ok because it’s the truth. I’d say 35-40% of FR and other Conservative subordinate media has been on evidence and reports of evidence. No traction (unless one still believes there is still some 9D Chess stratagem, and it does seem there are some brave souls who think a miracle will happen ...maybe it’s soft minds not brave souls).
If sufficient evidence is ‘Fred Astaire’, then the evidence required from Conservatives would be ‘Ginger Rogers’ ...who did everything Fred did, just backwards and in heels. Meaning? The evidence needed from Conservatives has to be massively overwhelming and not able to be ignored.
Anything else is only good for moral relief, emotional solace and maybe even catharsis - but will not make a difference in the real world.
Flame away, but it’s true.
Gorka was slamming this but I have seen many headlines on Italy, etc...
I appreciate the comments, and I don’t disagree on general
principles, but if one of your “tests” is that it hadn’t
been picked up by the media, please THINK!
The media hasn’t mentioned that ANTIFA was mixed in with the
Trump people last week.
The media won’t publish anything that detracts from their
narrative.
So you requiring this to be lofted by our media to be real,
is in itself rather silly.
This guy in the video, IS NOT the defendant’s attorney.
I don’t have a problem with this not being true. I’m just
not convinced at this point either way.
Some have talked about all the crazy things that have come
out, and I agree. This could be true, and still sound like
crazy talk.
So I’ll hold off a little longer before I completely
dismiss this.
I’d like to see it be true, but I have no problem with it
being found out not be be either.
So what do we actually have to provide to remove the fraudulent votes?
This fantasy porn stuff is of no help.
Nothing on it being flimsy that I have found. The CIA. They know.
What it does is toss everything into limbo.
This doesn’t have to be settled for Trump to have a reasoned
claim of illegitimacy.
If this is legit, it could be a game changer.
All we have to do is find one thing they simply cannot deny
or cover up, and everything will all of a sudden be a legitimate
thing to evaluate. What they refuse to check out, would then
have to be checked out.
I’m not saying this is definitely legit. I really don’t
know.
I am sure Brennen, you know the guy who wants the deplorables in concentration camps, knows all about it too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.