I’ve seen some youtube videos of experts presenting this evidence to government panels.
I did find it convincing and compelling. How could it not be?
But I also have to say that data scientists are not always great presenters. I thought they were rushed, you know, and, like, unclear, and, you know, but whatever, and that data, it’s, but and this should be obvious, and, like, the next chart, whatever …
Our side would do better with a canned, scripted, and rehearsed explanation for what happened.
For a canned, scripted and rehearsed explanation even the dumbest voter can follow,how about, “The lefties/democrats cheated and must be executed after a short, 5-min trial”?
I agree with you.
I think the presentations have been improving.
I think the understanding of what happened has been improving as well.
Video of the woman in Georgia running ballots through repeatedly helped drive home what the poll worker testimonies had witnessed.
Charts and clear explanation of the data flows are driving home that votes should never go negative. And that something is seriously wrong when they do.
I suspect based on Navarro’s report that was well designed, that any presentation he is part of will be a concise to the point presentation.