Posted on 01/02/2021 9:43:52 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Where's his data?
Screen shots?
Packet captures?
Report?
Anything?
Sorry, bub. You need to take the word of your betters on this.
Amazing that some people that in the past wanted data regarding climate change so they can evaluate for themselves, Obama's birth certificate, etc., now are aren't so intellectually curious to get data to evaluate claims made by Wood, Pulitzer, etc.
I guess it's another case of the seriousness of the charge trope that Dems like to roll out but with Republicans doing it.
I guess a troll in your mind is someone who wants to see evidence.
Evidence - its so overblown...
RE: Where’s his data?
It was presented LIVE to a Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee. It CONVINCED them to do an audit of every absentee ballot in Fulton County.
A few of the videos are shown here:
Here is a 50 minute video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6ifjSAkTTs
Now, watch the video and tell me where he’s wrong. Are the members of the Committee so dumb that they don’t understand what he’s trying to say?
troll
The other stuff in his video is pretty interesting and compelling.
Why? Because he provides EVIDENCE. Pictures, screen shots, etc.
He does none of that regarding his claim that they are “in” the system.
No screen shots, no packet captures, nothing.
So I think that cause a reasonably curious person to be skeptical of that particular claim.
I guess that's what people say when the can't argue the issue.
RE: No screen shots, no packet captures, nothing.
So I think that cause a reasonably curious person to be skeptical of that particular claim.
_________________________________
Well, that is for LAW ENFORCEMENT to look at. The problem I have is that I don’t see any honest DOJ investigation into this matter. Here we have a seemingly credible technology person telling us that the CEO of Dominion LIED to a Senate Committee when he said that their machines are not connected to the internet. One would think that this would spark the interest of the DOJ in the same manner that the hoax Russian Collusion narrative sparked their interest.
So screen shots, packet captures, etc. are important, but that can be presented in court or to law enforcement ( HONEST ONES, not the James Comey types ). Where are these people when you need them?
“I can’t read the writing on the ‘ballots’ run five times through the voting machines.” Therefore, no evidence.
Sheesh you guys are running the MSM, DNC, SocialMedia narrative for them.
What Fury wants is something that he can SEE with his own eyes.
If this is the case, then any eyewitness evidence is useless in his eyes. It would be like saying, OJ Simpson did not kill Nicole because nobody saw him do it and even if somebody said he did, he did not have a video, therefore that someone is not to be believed.
With this kind of attitude, ALL of the hundreds of sworn affidavits are to be thrown out unless they can provide video evidence. Instead of looking into and investigating their allegations, ignore them. They are all lying by default.
No, you're over-reaching with that statement.
This is a politically charged issue. Pulitzer made a claim - I'm skeptical of such claims as I work in that practice area. Seeing data such as packet captures, screen shost, etc would be helpful. It's not an unreasonable request and would be requested as part of a security assessment typically done by IT companies.
If he can provide a sworn affidavit of what was observed, that would be okay to (for me). But in the "real world" so to speak, IT security folks are going to ask for his data as well.
It's one thing to make a claim - it's another to back it up with evidence and data.
RE: Seeing data such as packet captures, screen shost, etc would be helpful. It’s not an unreasonable request and would be requested as part of a security assessment typically done by IT companies.
Pulitzer is not DUMB and he knows what he’s talking about. I would not presume to say that he does not have these information in his possession when he makes his presentation.
And what I want to see is REASONABLE. Given what he has presented to the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee compelling them to take action, the DOJ OUGHT TO be investigating this as this involves a foreign entity ( in this case China as per Pulitzer ).
I am sure Pulitzer can show to DOJ technical folks what he has gathered. If he can’t, well, then your skepticism will be justified. But for me, I am not going to assume that makes such a claim without data at all.
But where is the DOJ?
That's really not the point, and it's an example of an appeal to authority fallacy.
Guess we just have different perspectives. That would not cut it where I work, thankfully. If someone is making a claim about a potential security vulnerability, all their data would be welcomed and required.
Hopefully Pulitzer will provide that data, so a wider audience can review. If he doesn't, people can draw their own conclusions.
“troll”
Is that all you got? What in your simple mind is a troll? Someone who doesn’t automatically believe every wild claim that some so called expert throws out there to get clicks? I’ll ask you, where’s the ballots being shredded?
see 29, 30; also all those above who recognized you
“see 29, 30; also all those above who recognized you”
So you’re admitting you’re just another keyboard warrior using the anonymity of the internet to hurl insults at people and can’t back up all your big talk. I’ll make the same offer to you, I made to others. Show me one ballot being shredded in the video and I will donate $1000 to your favorite charity or Free Republic. Your choice. And if you can’t show me you do the same. Time to put up or shut up.
RE: That’s really not the point, and it’s an example of an appeal to authority fallacy.
My point is not a simple appeal to authority, it is a conclusion I draw from inference.
If a person is smart enough to perform a simple white hat hack into a voting system and show that the company CEO lied when he said the machines cannot connect to the internet, and can explain his steps in terms lay people can understand causing them to be convinced enough to take action,
Then it is not beyond reason to say that he has the data to show those interested and technically competent enough to back up his claims.
The issue is NOT Pulitzer himself, the issue is... where are those people in authority who should be investigating his findings? They can pose the same challenges and questions you posed.
Where are they? It’s their duty to act. The future of this country is at stake.
Did I strike a nerve? So sorry.
WHY IS THIS TROLL STILL HERE?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.