No, you're over-reaching with that statement.
This is a politically charged issue. Pulitzer made a claim - I'm skeptical of such claims as I work in that practice area. Seeing data such as packet captures, screen shost, etc would be helpful. It's not an unreasonable request and would be requested as part of a security assessment typically done by IT companies.
If he can provide a sworn affidavit of what was observed, that would be okay to (for me). But in the "real world" so to speak, IT security folks are going to ask for his data as well.
It's one thing to make a claim - it's another to back it up with evidence and data.
RE: Seeing data such as packet captures, screen shost, etc would be helpful. It’s not an unreasonable request and would be requested as part of a security assessment typically done by IT companies.
Pulitzer is not DUMB and he knows what he’s talking about. I would not presume to say that he does not have these information in his possession when he makes his presentation.
And what I want to see is REASONABLE. Given what he has presented to the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee compelling them to take action, the DOJ OUGHT TO be investigating this as this involves a foreign entity ( in this case China as per Pulitzer ).
I am sure Pulitzer can show to DOJ technical folks what he has gathered. If he can’t, well, then your skepticism will be justified. But for me, I am not going to assume that makes such a claim without data at all.
But where is the DOJ?