The other stuff in his video is pretty interesting and compelling.
Why? Because he provides EVIDENCE. Pictures, screen shots, etc.
He does none of that regarding his claim that they are “in” the system.
No screen shots, no packet captures, nothing.
So I think that cause a reasonably curious person to be skeptical of that particular claim.
RE: No screen shots, no packet captures, nothing.
So I think that cause a reasonably curious person to be skeptical of that particular claim.
_________________________________
Well, that is for LAW ENFORCEMENT to look at. The problem I have is that I don’t see any honest DOJ investigation into this matter. Here we have a seemingly credible technology person telling us that the CEO of Dominion LIED to a Senate Committee when he said that their machines are not connected to the internet. One would think that this would spark the interest of the DOJ in the same manner that the hoax Russian Collusion narrative sparked their interest.
So screen shots, packet captures, etc. are important, but that can be presented in court or to law enforcement ( HONEST ONES, not the James Comey types ). Where are these people when you need them?