What part of “public testimony before a state legislative committee” do you fail to comprehend? That is what Jovan Pulitzer, regardless of what birth name he was given, was doing. He was VOLUNTEERING his expertise in analyzing the publicly available data.
While doing so, he was interrupted by one of those assisting with the news that they had just gotten the information that one of their specialists had gotten into a piece of equipment at a polling place discovering that it was actually connected to the internet AND simultaneously connected to somewhere in China. Pulitzer made that announcement based on a few seconds of information whispered in his ear. He did not have the technical data at that time. I watched this happen in real time. The comment about the internet/China connectivity was merely an irrelevant interruption to his primary testimony.
Pulitzer’s primary testimony was that he had discovered there was a significant difference between the reference markings on printed ballots among precincts that were primarily Democrat leaning and those which were Republican leaning which would cause the machines to differentiate how those ballots were scanned. These scanning markings should not have such differentiations in a general election in which there were no partisan offices being voted on. This was later validated by photographs showing provisional ballots printed with only the stacks differing by the cover page for Fulton County being marked as either “DEM,” “REP,” or “NP,” and differing scan marks to position the scan readers, yet no county party offices to be voted.
Fulton County Precinct Ballots shown with Party differentiation in stacks!
Ballot extracted from package showing that it is for November 3, 2020 General Election!
Pulitzer was pointing out that the scanning devices, using the registration marks on the printed ballots, would shift the scanning over to the left of the page by about 2mm on ballots in precincts that had high Republican voter numbers, while keeping them in the normal position for high Democrat voter number precincts. <[> This mis-positioning of the scanning of the bubbles may account for the inordinate and actually absurd percentage of ballots (over 60%) that required adjudication (human interpretation of voter intent/ballot alteration or vote replacement) in some precincts in Fulton County before being counted, which in Fulton County was done without partisan monitors’ observation in a closed room environment within the Dominion machines.