Agreed (for the time being at least).
Long on claims, short on data and evidence.
There’s been way too much noise, assertions made with no testable facts accompanying such statements.
Aren’t these people vetted before they are brought to the table? If he had come to me with those claims I would “red teamed” him until it was understood no claim to be made before a committee without an accompanying fact to back it up. Also no speculation unless it’s requested and clearly stated as speculation.
There is no rational discipline in any of this. Just because someone tells me what I want to hear that doesn’t make him correct !