I’m curious about the timing.
Does the VP accept the votes first? Then the President shows the evidence indicating that it was a travesty and that congress just made an awful mistake?
Or does the President release the evidence showing it’s a travesty and then the VP reject some ballots and throw it into a two-hour debate?
And if there is a closed door two-hour debate, what is said? Will THAT conversation really be about the evidence? Or will it be about treason and military tribunals and the end the world?
When filing the challenge the members making the challenge must include their reasons. That might be one way of getting some of Trump's evidence into the record. During the debate may be another.