Sayin’ it vs provin’ it.
Exactly what would you accept as "proof?"
I doubt it would make any difference if there was incontrovertible proof. All but a handful of members of Congress are bought and paid for by China or other special interests. Our nation has been looted and sold.
Law?? WHAT LAW? The robes are as CORRUPT as the PERPS. Some liars...er lawyers are as CORRUPT as the robes. (Personal experience...for another time...mine was on retainer from the PERP BIG COMPANY I was taking to “arbitration”. Million $ in sales company that I and hard-working employees had built from $600k in a couple of years) The technique was very DVS.
Heads they won, tails I lost.
Happy New Year Americans
you are lying or you are a troll...maybe just not very intelligent...
“Sayin’ it vs provin’ it.”
What are you babbling about?
Sayin’ it vs provin’ it.
You probably know as much about law as I do marine biology.
In law, one sworn statement is considered evidence. Unless it can be proven that a sworn statement is a lie/fraudulent, it’s also considered proof/fact of events.
In the election nationally, there are now thousands of sworn statements of fraud. Not to mention statistical evidence, machine evidence, ballot evidence, video evidence etc. etc etc...
But hey, you tell me...what is “provin’ it”?
“Sayin’ it vs provin’ it.”
Proving it is as simple as taking the 900 ballots from the military and contacting them personally to confirm their vote. Shouldn’t take more than a few hours for a dozen or so people to get done.
Then you need to look at how many GA residents are in the military, if they are registered to vote and contact them to see if they in fact did vote.
Your saying there is no proof is the same as the Libs claiming no evidence even though Judges across the country won’t alow the evidence to even be heard.