Posted on 12/30/2020 11:13:18 AM PST by SeekAndFind
December 30, 2020 | 1:35 PM ET
During a Senate hearing in Georgia over fraud in the 2020 presidential election, Jovan Pulitzer told the senate members, “At this very moment at a polling location in the county, not only do we now have access to the devices through the poll pad — the system — but we are in.”
Pulitzer told the senators this should not be able to happen, but his team was has able to hack into the voting system and has documented evidence to prove it.
Pulitzer said the machines are connected to the internet and two-way communication is occurring in real-time. “It’s receiving data and sending data,” he said.
When questioned, Pulitzer said the polling place his team hacked into is a physical location, not a mobile station. Pulitzer said his team has access to the data from the Georgia Senate runoff race from the polling station.
Saying a car in front you going 90 miles an hour didn’t get a ticket wont save you from getting a ticket...
The dems have had almost two months to “Fix” the evidence. The evidence is not even protected from tampering.
Win by any means necessary.
what is your evidence that said hacker was authorized to hack into an election?
You have none.
He absolutely could be charged if he didn’t get authority to do it by people authorized to give him that authority.
Perhaps he was given legal permission. I hope so.
Hacking into an election machine is illegal. ARREST HIM AND HIS TEAM!
Stop thinking like a Boy Scout and start thinking like a cartel member.
Just for grins and a few years in prison, reps 100 percent vote, to make a point. Supreme court takes it in 5 minutes. Bastards.
...and a ceramic back plate.
If WE cheated to win - the damn MSM would be screaming from the rooftops...
Pulitzer testified earlier in the hearing that accessing the data allows a third party to change whatever and return it to the local system. It is a two way street.
RE: Hacking into an election machine is illegal. ARREST HIM AND HIS TEAM!
Nope, not all hacking is illegal.
ETHICAL HACKING, the type that shows a system’s vulnerabilities to users for the purpose of learning is NOT a crime. In fact, good ETHICAL hackers are in high demand by Cybersecurity companies.
Um, no. The Rats cheated so now we play by their rules.
He stated you could extract data, alter it, and reinsert it. So yes, an offsite entity could alter votes.
The ONLY way the Dems come out of this unscathed is to acknowledge vote fraud and claim foreign interference.
Think they’ll do that? Me neither.
Hats off to whoever decided to bring this Pulitzer fellow in.
A lot depends on the evidence of fraud not just existing but being *presented in an effective way* so that politicians have the political cover to take action.
You know Trump must be loving Pulitzer’s skillful showmanship.
Hi.
There is obviously massive voter fraud in at least seven states. There is video evidence, sworn testimony, sworn affidavits, statistical evidence, etc. that something happened.
If the corrupt corporate news media, social medias and democrats are concerned with our country, then they should all welcome transparency.
If not, the shooting will start at some point.
5.56mm
Guess I should have posted a sarcasm tag but thanks for the post in case others were not aware.
Listen to the video again: the communication is TWO-way and, there is the potential for a man-in-the-middle attack. In other words, given more time, yes, they could actually switch the votes.
exactly who do you think in the Georgia Govt has the authority to authorize a hack into the election system during an election..especially without the consent of the SoS who runs the election
Maybe because they illegally and unlawfully censor other information they do not like, all the time? (Just a guess.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.