That’s nice. All those purrfectly healthy cats tolerated the mRNA “vaccine” just fine, too ... and then later they DIED when they encountered actual coronavirus because their own immune systems killed THEM. I cannot fathom how anyone who has actually studied this mRNA technology can agree to this “vaccine”. It tricks your own cells into accepting a lipid, something your cell wants (food), but your cell does not know that nanotechnology instructions are attached to the lipid that will cause your ribosomes to produce synthetic CV19 spike proteins. Gee, what could possibly go wrong! Why would anyone accept this?
And it is absolutely true that in Australia the vaccine victims started testing positive for HIV after taking the shots. The pharma company explained that they had used HIV parts as “stabilizers” in their vaccine. What?! Who even thought to test them for HIV anyway? No one informed them of this potential and that is the definition of “informed consent”, you know, bothering to tell the Guinea pigs. So Australia stopped giving the jab and cancelled the order with that company. How wonderful of them. But what about these victims, now HIV positive, their own bodies producing HIV proteins and antibodies?
Certainly understand concerns but no one has hiv from this. And won’t
*** that will cause your ribosomes to produce synthetic CV19 spike proteins***
It causes your ribosomes to produce instructions to t-cells and their helper cells to attack a specific chemical component of the specific CCPVirus spike protein, rendering it incapable of penetrating a cell
*vaccine victims started testing positive for HIV after taking the shots*
It caused patients to start testing positive for HIV ANTIBODIES. It did not give them the disease. Having antibodies to HIV probably isn’t a bad thing but it can skew data for HIV infection rate in a population.