[JustaCowgirl]

I agree completely. Very disappointed in Barrett and Kavanaugh.

[newfreep]

I would not be surprised if Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Barrett were threatened with the same fate as Scalia.

[BrexitBen]

Just imagine the deep regret the present Supreme Court will feel when the Court is packed with 3-7 new, socialist justices.

It must be the fluoride in the drinking water that’s causing the mass cowardice in the Beltway.

[9YearLurker]

No reason not to include Gorsuch in there too.

[alloysteel]

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.”

And nothing seems to be at the top of the agenda.

“I see nossing! NOSS-ING!” - Sergeant Schultz of “Hogan’s Heroes”

[volunbeer]

The constitution should NOT be a partisan document, but it now is viewed as partisan by media, big tech, the democrats, the republicrats, and academia.

The American people are being lied to en masse. “There is no evidence” they tell us of fraud and “what evidence there is would not change the result (we want).” This is the message.

Thanks to a few anarchist idiots there are also fears of riots.

SCOTUS has essentially bowed down before the first group and likely has fear of the second trusting that “conservatives” will not resort to civil disorder.

It really is shameful on so many levels. The constitution and laws are clear. Both were violated severely in this election.

There is no easy way to fix this, but the choices are clear. Uphold the law and constitution you swore to serve OR allow the unconstitutional theft of an election and damage it forever.

It amazes me that so few of them see the long term consequences will be FAR WORSE than their current course of action.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

Those robed clowns are more likely to hear a death penalty case for a lowlife serial killer than the “death penalty case” of our Constitution and Republic.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

I agree completely.

I would too, except for one thing; It's not their job. It is their job to review cases brought before them and rule on them by interpreting the law.

If someone else wants to file a suit to protect our freedom of speech, the right to own a weapon, property rights and our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness then they can do so. Eventually the Supreme Court may be asked to rule on such a suit. Until then they are powerless. It is up to the various District Attorneys and or Attorney General to start the process.

[ptsal]

SCOTS is no longer relevant.

[sauropod]

Me as well.

[polymuser]

Are they all attorneys?

‘nuff said.