Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy: China did not 'expel' USS John S. McCain from South China Sea
https://www.upi.com ^ | DEC. 23, 2020 / 11:58 AM | ByEd Adamczyk

Posted on 12/23/2020 9:48:15 AM PST by RomanSoldier19

Claims by China that that it "expelled" the guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain from disputed South China Seawaters are untrue, the U.S. Navy said.

"On Dec. 22, USS John S. McCain (DDG 56) asserted navigational rights and freedoms in the Spratly Islands, consistent with international law," a statement Tuesday by the Navy's 7th Fleet began.

"This freedom of navigation operation ... upheld the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea recognized in international law by challenging restrictions on innocent passage imposed by China, Vietnam and Taiwan.

"All interactions with foreign military forces were consistent with international norms and did not impact the operation."

The Chinese statement came after the ship passed near the archipelago of small islands, reefs and atolls in the South China Sea, an area claimed by China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. China has installed an airstrip and several buildings on the site.

(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccp; usanavy

1 posted on 12/23/2020 9:48:15 AM PST by RomanSoldier19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

I’m surprised they didn’t hit anything.


2 posted on 12/23/2020 9:50:37 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("Sorry, your race card has been declined. Can you present any other form of argument?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

“Did not.”

“Did too.”

(repeat as needed).


3 posted on 12/23/2020 9:52:10 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Lol. Commie theatrics. PR is all they have. All they did was have a couple of vessels carefully follow the McCain out of the region. Safely to the rear. Now they do their usual posturing.


4 posted on 12/23/2020 9:56:15 AM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

If Biden becomes president they won’t have to complain about us operating there anymore. China will be free to dominate the region.


5 posted on 12/23/2020 9:57:19 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

6 posted on 12/23/2020 9:57:38 AM PST by BBQToadRibs2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

the navy wasn’t expelled from the SCS any more than I was expelled from the McDonald’s drive thru after I got my big mac.


7 posted on 12/23/2020 10:05:29 AM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

8 posted on 12/23/2020 10:09:03 AM PST by RomanSoldier19 (Game over, man! Game over! ; : rem ad triarios redisse is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Can you trust what the navy says?

Seems a fair question, now days.


9 posted on 12/23/2020 10:14:36 AM PST by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

no, it seems like an idiotic question. but there are a lot of those on FR “now days”.


10 posted on 12/23/2020 10:35:26 AM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

It’s the McCain, so it probably ran...


11 posted on 12/23/2020 10:56:18 AM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

The number of people and organizations I trust without questioning has gotten is rather small since November. You evidently don’t need to question some government departments. I would suggest you look up the West Point cheating story from a couple of days ago.


12 posted on 12/23/2020 11:19:38 AM PST by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

In a choice between the us navy and the plan, I’m going with our navy every time.

especially when the plan story is obviously overheated propaganda.

enjoy trying to explain your weirdness away. Jesus. What a mess.


13 posted on 12/23/2020 11:43:08 AM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

I didn’t say trust the plan. I questioned your blind faith in the Navy being honest. The fact that they are somewhat more honest than the plan is not that encouraging. Do you really want to define anyone who questions the trust level about a government department as weird?


14 posted on 12/23/2020 12:48:10 PM PST by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?
. . . they [the us navy] are somewhat more honest than the plan . . .
didn't read any further than that.

done with you.

15 posted on 12/23/2020 12:52:41 PM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson