Posted on 12/22/2020 8:14:55 AM PST by RandFan
In an op-ed titled "Why I will not accept Joe Biden as president," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich writes that his unwillingness to accept the election results rises from an outrage he says he previously hasn't felt.
Gingrich wrote that he'd been asked by a "smart friend of mine" why he couldn't accept Biden's win over President Trump.
"As I thought about it, I realized my anger and fear were not narrowly focused on votes," Gingrich wrote in an Op-Ed published Monday in the Washington Times. "My unwillingness to relax and accept that the election was over grew out of a level of outrage and alienation unlike anything I had experienced in more than 60 years involvement in public affairs."
Gingrich also said the two parties and liberals and conservatives "live in alternative worlds."
"You have more than 74 million voters who supported President Trump despite everything — and given the election mess, the number could easily be significantly higher. The truth is tens of millions of Americans are deeply alienated and angry," Gingrich wrote. "If Mr. Biden governs from the left — and he will almost certainly be forced to — that number will grow rapidly, and we will win a massive election in 2022."
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Nope, take the House in 2022 and impeach AND convict in the Senate.
But, but, but, Barrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!
Once the Deep State consolidates its power there will never be another fair election in the United States. If Newt is unhappy with Biden wait till he sees what President Harris has planned. Venezuela will look like paradise when Harris is finished.
Don't be silly they will count if you vote for the Commie.
No seduction involved, just offers you can't refuse. Sadly I fear most will not refuse them.
I love Gingrich, but he is a johnny come lately. When Mary Landrieu stole her senate seat in her 2002 reelection, Newt looked the other way. He didn’t care cause the senate remained in R hands. I know he was in the house, but the evidence of fraud was there and he refused a congressional investigation. This has been going on forever. Obama reelect in 2012 was a ruse as well. He may have won anyway, but no way by the margins he did. They overshot by a mile to make sure the first half black did not lose reelection. Romney had huge crowds everywhere, not like Trump but they dwarfed anything obama had. His signs were everywhere, obama had none and they picked up 2 senate seats when they should have lost 4 seats. A little late there vatican boy.
I love Gingrich, but he is a johnny come lately. When Mary Landrieu stole her senate seat in her 2002 reelection, Newt looked the other way. He didn’t care cause the senate remained in R hands. I know he was in the house, but the evidence of fraud was there and he refused a congressional investigation. This has been going on forever. Obama reelect in 2012 was a ruse as well. He may have won anyway, but no way by the margins he did. They overshot by a mile to make sure the first half black did not lose reelection. Romney had huge crowds everywhere, not like Trump but they dwarfed anything obama had. His signs were everywhere, obama had none and they picked up 2 senate seats when they should have lost 4 seats. A little late there vatican boy.
OK, we’ll hold off on impeachment until after we take the House. But until then NONE of us should accept his presidency as legitimate.
You’re right... and I’m proud of the fact our people fight the thugs on our own time with our own effort... But it’s time to get real and get organized.
We need to form ‘nonprofits’ and pay ourselves and our fellow countrymen just like white liberal ‘elites’ do... they don’t ‘organize’ on their dime. They do it with OUR dimes.
Did you know all TV and radio stations are required to run ‘public service announcement’ - FOR FREE - and that only liberal groups take them up on the offer? All those TV spots you’re seeing about ‘coming together’ are taped by liberals and put on TV for free.
We can do this...
Add all of that to the keyboard commandos to-do list.
Mine, either
Yep. Still bothers me today.
B1 Bob was a good guy. The Deep State Republicans didn't
like the guy because he was rabidly pro-United States.
They didn't lift a finger to help him. And it actually does
remind me of how they treated Trump over the last five years.
will never forget it
Let us not forget that Newt is one who influenced the Freedom Caucus to self destruct by voting for Paul Ryan as speaker.also he authored the RINO post-mortem for Romney. Newt was great once but sold out to the globalists. Why do you think he’s writing for the Hill?
Thanks for the information. Seems hopeless for secure comms.
Guess the only way is for highly trusted family/friends word of mouth in person. Too slow and still can be infiltrated as any group of people can be. I just want to be able to communicate any thoughts in private - nothing that is seditious or rabble-rousing or promoting these ridiculous claims of Civil War from the keyboard commandos.
They are dreaming if they think it will come to a face-off between them and the LEO's and National Guard. It would be death by stupid.
All Sloe Joe has EVER wanted to be is President.
He has been angling for the White House his entire life!
He won’t make it!
President Trump will be sworn in as President of the USA on Jan 20, 2021!
Way back in 2001 NSA William Binney and a small crew investigated the giga-enormous data storage requirements of NSA vacuum cleaner SOP. No way was there adequate physical capacity to store then current full message traffic, much less the exponential growth of web and mobile phones.
Binney addressed the problem via signal traffic analysis tracing connections of traffic flow and ebb linked on timeline of events...basic meta data not full text. Short story...Binney was able to establish algorithms that could track all msgs globally...let that sink in...every email, text, and voice traffic across the globe...and able to do it via desktop PCs in 2001 obviating the need for full content. The meta linkage found the connections between persons of interest for further surveillance...FISA material.
Binney quickly become concerned about personal privacy and enacted security protocols to ensure individual privacy against broad undirected spying.
End of story, change in NSA chief who saw both departmental and personal wealth accrual, shit canned Binney, staff, and hardware opting for cumbersome system require gigantic data farms...and quoted as saying “we can dine off this for 15 years
So one initially becomes a target not in what you say but who one says it to, along with frequency and duration that mark one as a person of interest.
Just as Travis says, encryption under certain conditions paints a target on one and cascades to contacts.
Got it. Thanks. So what is your thinking on close knit family/friends talking in person? Is that the only way left for privacy and building peaceful revolutionary groups? By that, I’m not encouraging revolution nor cwII types. However, they deserve their privacy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.