A pile of shit article.
If they wrote up the wrong bill then they would have no standing. I would be willing to bet it is being rewritten as we speak.
The President signed onto that petition.Presumably he doesn’t have standing either. SCOTUS refused to hear the case because they knew if they did they’d have to grant the petitioners the relief they asked for. And then those who voted in favor of granting that relief would be in actual danger of harm,as would their families.
Lots of words, little or no action.
The enemy is going all out for the win in GA for two US Senate seats in runoffs January 5. As of today, they look to be on track to win.
Then all the ‘words’ will be as graffiti on a dead republic.
* All future elections will be rigged.
* The Supreme Court will be restructured.
* The CCP model will proceed over years to become the norm of life. Some say genocide will occur.
BS. Texas is clearly harmed by massive vote fraud in other states in relation to who is president.
Plus the constitution requires the USSC court to hear cases where there are disputes between states. The only standing required is that Texas is state, and that they are suing another state. Any laws stating otherwise are laws that are not in the constitution, and therefore invalid.
The states that set up a voting system that violated the U.S. Constitution created the uncertainty about whether illegally cast votes caused a result different from that which would have occurred if the system was not in violation of the Constitution. Because the states who violated the Constitution created the uncertainty, the burden of proof should shift to them to prove that their unconstitutional system DID NOT create a result different from what would have occurred if their systems were legal. The burden of proof should be on the party that illegally created the uncertainty.
Ain’t buyin’ it.
I wonder if the Trump Traitors Amy Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsesh are putting reporters up to this as a way to save face.
I wouldn’t doubt it.
Garbage....total bovine excrement 👎
At the end of the day the legislatures in those states are responsible for the electors. If they lacked the guts to do anything there is nothing anyone else can do about it
I think if anyone has standing, it would be the State legislators who's power was usurped by PA SC, Sec of State decree, governor's covid orders etc who changed election rules because that's the State legislators' job.
I hope that SCOTUS is prepared to welcome new hard-left activist judges with a packed court.
I bet Texas has standing to contribute whenever the fed govt wants to bail somebody out.
According to Article III, Section 2, the Federal courts have jurisdiction in “cases in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States . . . [and] to controversies between two or more states . . . “. That seems to clearly give the USSC the authority to hear this case, and for Texas to file it. However, it’s quite possible that two centuries of Court activism and revisionism have warped this doctrine, as it has warped so many others.
Always fascinating to see the number of constitutional legal scholars on FR!
Maybe the Texas filing and SCUTUS denial was all part of the overall plan. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/donald-trumps-stealthy-road-victory-172235
Well, trust me Thomas Perry - YOU don't want the results of 60 million Americans knowing democrats have been stealing elections since Chicago's South Side (white 'elites' and the 'black community) joined to steal the election for Kennedy.
So the USSC has the authority to regulate the content of speech at high school graduation ceremonies, but not to address potential fraud and illegalities in a presidential election?
The Supreme Court's Rejection Of Texas's Election Lawsuit Failed The Constitution
There is a group that knows how to play both sides of the matter. Having said that they are mostly lawyers, so you kinda expect that.
Could they not re-file the case with named texas citizens as impacted to gain standing? Especially since yesterday?