Stylin19
Are they Kiddin me?
OPINION FILED: December 14, 2020
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS:
ORAL ARGUMENT: September 29, 2020
A Pox on all their houses...
Read the court opinion:
So 150,000 ineligible votes were cast t hen? Note, I’m terrible at math, someone e correct me if I’m wrong?
FROM THE RULING-—
Therefore, neither
county clerks nor an order of the Governor may declare persons
indefinitely confined.
FROM THE RULING-—
The statute
enumerates three reasons sufficient to constitute indefinite
confinement. When the legislature explicitly includes certain
conditions in meeting a statutory standard, we may presume that
the legislature purposefully excluded others.
This is not the case that was argued on Saturday. This dates from September
This is not the case that was argued on Saturday. This dates from September
Trump is out of time. The only solution at this point is martial law under the auspices of stopping a coup, based on the evidence at hand. And there is more than enough.
That is, unless we are all duped by fake news and CNN is right. :)
“””But the court noted that a determination must be made in every case before tossing a ballot”””
This is why we should only post the Judge’s rulings, the Plaintiff’s Complaints, and the Defendant’s Responses.
The ruling from this court did NOT talk about tossing a ballot.
The focus of this ruling was that neither the Governor nor local election officials could declare a person ‘indefinitely confined’. Only a person could so make such a claim.
Wisconsin wants to ‘go down gamblin’....
Well the WI Supreme Court did not rule in favor of Trump, so I don’t think this matters.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/wisconsin-supreme-court-tosses-trump-170055723.html
It is a meaningless victory. It says the state made an error.
But it says that they must individually investigate EACH voter, and show the voter was wrong.
Clearly, the voters were wrong in many cases, but how are you going to do this? Remember, you have no idea who they voted for, and their ballots are separated from the names.
So, at best, you might be able to track down all of these voters, and get some of them to sign an affidavit that they did NOT meet the qualification for absentee ballot use.
I can assure you people who voted Democrat are not going to do that, and if they do, they are not going to say they voted for Biden.
If you get enough to be larger than the difference in the final vote, you can then argue that the entire vote is tainted, and the results cannot be determined accurately. If you had twice as many, the argument would be sounder.
And now it is March, Biden has been president for 2 months, and you are going to try to convince a court to reverse the electoral votes of Michigan, which won’t change the results.
This is a good lawsuit, and should have been filed the day after the state issued the guidance.