Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear voter fraud case Saturday
NOQ Report ^ | 12/11/2020 | JD Rucker

Posted on 12/11/2020 5:25:16 PM PST by SeekAndFind

While most of the nation is looking to the U.S. Supreme Court on major election issues, the Wisconsin Supreme Court may be the first domino to fall in favor of the President's reelection.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed to hear a the President’s voter fraud case hours after it was shot down by a lower court. And while most in the political world are watching the U.S. Supreme Court very closely, the Wisconsin case may be the best bet for a Trump win as the first major domino to fall in his advantage after the Texas case was dismissed by the Supreme Court today.

The lawsuit contends that large swaths of votes were fraudulent and should be thrown out of the ballot tally for the presidential race. Former Vice President Joe Biden had an unexpected, miraculous come-from-behind “victory” the day after the election when an inexplicable percentage of the last ballots counted wnet in his favor. According to Just The News:

_________________________________________________

The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed Friday evening to hear President Donald Trump’s lawsuit seeking to throw out tens of thousands of ballots in two of the state’s Democratic strongholds, and moved quickly to schedule arguments for noon Saturday.

The decision came hours after a lower court rejected the Trump request to invalidate the state’s certification of Joe Biden as the winner and the president’s legal team skipped the state appeals court by going directly to Wisconsin’s highest court.

The campaign is seeking to throw out large swaths of ballots in Milwaukee and Dane counties, arguing there were absentee ballot irregularities in both Democratic-leaning urban centers. The high court’s decision was first reported by the Wisconsin State Journal.

_________________________________________________

Earlier Friday, Racine County Reserve Circuit Judge Stephen Simanek rejected the lawsuit and concluded Trump’s legal team had failed to prove Wisconsin’s voting laws were violated.

The court is made up of seven justices, six of whom are women. It is generally considered to have a right-leaning majority, though three of the “originalists” on the court are far from conservative. Nevertheless, this bodes well for the Trump campaign as it offers his team their first opportunity to make their case before a higher court that may lean in their direction.

If the Wisconsin Supreme Court is able to acknowledge the massive voter fraud that is apparent to millions of Americans, expect the left to paint this as “stealing” the election. It’s not. This is about correcting previously erroneous results.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: dirtyelection; dirtywisconsin; supremecourt; voterfraud; wisconsin; wisconzuela

1 posted on 12/11/2020 5:25:16 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W12J7BYlj-E


2 posted on 12/11/2020 5:26:36 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Trust the plan of the 17th letter of the English alphabet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I don’t see the relevance of that video to this topic...


3 posted on 12/11/2020 5:27:30 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Lucy has been getting a workout post-Election Day.


4 posted on 12/11/2020 5:27:59 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nothing will come of it. The US Supreme Court decision to not hear the Texas case will give all these lower courts cover to do absolutely nothing.


5 posted on 12/11/2020 5:29:57 PM PST by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: falcon99

Unless Trump can get over 270, none of it matters.


6 posted on 12/11/2020 5:48:56 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (I'm old enough to remember when you actually had to be able to do something to be hired to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Just dismiss it and get it over with. We are no longer a republic


7 posted on 12/11/2020 5:51:58 PM PST by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: falcon99

Not so. SCOTUS was procedural ruling, not on merits or evidence.


8 posted on 12/11/2020 5:53:10 PM PST by Rennes Templar (Heaven has a wall and gates. Hell has open borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

Contingent Election

Thats the goal. Not an easy one and hasnt happened in close to 200 years, but thats the goal.


9 posted on 12/11/2020 5:57:27 PM PST by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marko413

SCOW is nearly an all-girl orchestra!


10 posted on 12/11/2020 8:00:09 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
Unless Trump can get over 270, none of it matters.

No, Trump must just get Biteme below 270. That said, I have no faith that this or any other court is going to help Trump.

11 posted on 12/11/2020 9:06:56 PM PST by KevinB (Those who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either being made.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They’ll probably dismiss the case without actually looking at a single piece of evidence.


12 posted on 12/11/2020 9:14:49 PM PST by libertylover (Remember: Deep State hated Jesus too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

You seriously don’t think the lower judges won’t use this as cover? It was not procedural either. They refused to even hear the case which is a primary responsibility of the Court when states are involved. In addition, Thomas and Alito, the two who dissented saying they should at least hear the case said that even if they heard the case they would provide no resolution to Texas’ case.


13 posted on 12/12/2020 10:32:43 AM PST by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson