There’s a reason the media is suddenly reporting on Hunter Biden’s corruption; An article in The New York Times essentially confirms why the Hunter Biden story is suddenly Page One news

In the world of Democrat politics, there are no coincidences. With that principle in mind, it’s possible to understand why Democrat media outlets are suddenly reporting about Hunter Biden’s corruption, a story that spills over onto his father. The first is to get ahead of potential breaking news about Hunter's imminent arrest. The second theory is the one Monica Showalter advanced: The leftists used Biden to attain the White House (or so they believe) and are now ready to get rid of him. Having a criminal son may be just what the Obama/Harris camp needs to make that happen. And if there’s any doubt about this theory, an article in The New York Times seems to lay it to rest.

We conservatives remember how, in October, the media and the tech tyrants conspired to block any reports about Hunter Biden, whether those reports were the Senate Intelligence Committee’s findings about the $3.5 million Hunter received from the wife of a Russian politician, or the shocking details of political corruption, drug addiction, and sexual debauchery contained on his hard drive.

Well, to ordinary people, these stories were shocking. To the media and the tech tyrants, these stories were potential dangers to Joe Biden’s candidacy. They had to be stopped – and stopped they were. Twitter and Facebook, the two biggest social media tech tyrants, refused to allow any reports to circulate and banned people, including President Trump’s press secretary, from their platforms when they refused to bow down to this censorship.

News outlets derided the reports about the Biden family’s corrupt dealings, all of which implicated Joe Biden as the man who pimped out his addled son for huge sums of money, as non-stories. That’s not an exaggeration. It’s explicitly what NPR’s public editor said:

HERE ARE SOME POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE NON-REPORT PRE-ELECTION :

Suddenly, though, the media is releasing information about the criminal investigations into not both Hunter Biden and Joe’s brother, James Biden. As the above tweet notes, these investigations have been ongoing for years. We also know that a sizable number of voters would have passed over Biden for Trump had they known about Biden family corruption. So, what gives? Why are Hunter and, by extension, Joe himself, suddenly fair game?

It could be that bad things are about to come down from the FBI. After all, Trump did promise that “a lot of big things” will happen soon. The sudden flurry of reports about the Bidens could just be the Democrats’ way of getting ahead of the story so that, if Hunter is shown doing the perp walk, they can say that it’s “old news.”

However, it’s equally likely that the Democrats are making plans to get Biden out of office as quickly as possible – or perhaps, sideline him before he’s even sworn in (assuming, of course, that Biden hangs onto that president-elect title). As Monica Showalter pointed out on Thursday, Biden is not making leftists happy. He’s filling his possible administration with corporate insiders, he wants a former military officer to head the defense department, and he’s continuing to show a very rapid cognitive decline. He’s offering Clinton-era politics with a side of dementia and that is not what the hard left side of the party wants.

Strange stuff this week:

Swalwell unmasked

We learn that for 2 years Hunter’s been under criminal investigation

We learn that for 4 years the FBI has been sitting on Seth Rich’s computer and thousands of papers and lying about it.

Who blew open the FBI vaults and why now?

[AND ARE WE GOING TO HEAR ANYTHING FROM JOHN DURHAM ? ]

The answer to your last question is "No", because John Durham does not exist.

The Dems will now, obviously, use Hunter as leverage to get Joe out of the way for Kameltoe.

The deal with Seth Rich is still part of the fog of war. Believe that when you see Dems throwing each other under the bus over it. (Hint, keep a watch on Hillary and Donna Brazile, also Chris Wray.)

>>AND ARE WE GOING TO HEAR ANYTHING FROM JOHN DURHAM?<<

There was also a false report of Barr stepping down. Strange story indeed if true, but Barr’s office denied it.

Was it an attempt to make it look as if Barr was a turncoat that had completed his task of slow walking an investigation and now abandoning ship?

The the story Barr giving Durham special counsel status to protect the investigation.

Odd timing. I’m holding my opinions regarding Durham until Jan. 20th.

I think the Left is done with their Trogan horse.

They now want to discredit biden and get rid of him. If they can make him look bad enough people will not complain too bad when he is removed.

Would they have been smarter and keep him around to take the blame for the crap they plan on pulling? Time will tell.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.