Trump supporters are right to doubt election integrity

https://www.wnd.com ^ | December 10, 2020 | David Limbaugh

[NKP_Vet]

Some accuse Trump supporters of manufacturing allegations of voter fraud out of whole cloth and resisting the presidential election results in response to their supposed cult leader's wishes. As usual, President Donald Trump is the villain and his supporters are complicit.

But again, the Trump-hating critics are wrong. Nationwide GOP distrust and outrage over the election is a grassroots phenomenon. Trump supporters did not take their cue from Trump. They witnessed the numerous anomalies on election night and beyond and recognized mischief when they saw it.

Am I saying the election was stolen? Well, I firmly believe that massive cheating occurred, especially in the so-called swing states. I can't be sure whether there was enough to change the outcome of the election, though I strongly suspect it.

[NKP_Vet]

David Limbaugh notes huge election coattail effect ... but the owner of the tails lost?

[Theophilous Meatyard III]

If it looks like a putrid mess, smells like a putrid mess, and sounds like a putrid mess, it just may be a putrid mess.

[Jimmy The Snake]

I explained it to a Lib College football fan this way. Suppose Ohio State wins the National Championship on a QB run for a TD when the 2nd string Line Man who throws a key block on the play turns out was Academically Ineligible to play due to bad grades but Ohio State covered that fact up till after the game was played. Does Ohio State still keep the title. He then agreed w/ me.

[joma89]

It is simple election fraud by democrats, all the way down.

JoMa

[Kazan]

And, Trump won 18 of 19 bellwether countries that had voted with the winner since 1980.

[MikelTackNailer]

If President Trump's challenges fail in court, it won't necessarily mean massive cheating didn't occur. It could mean any number of other things: that his lawyers couldn't quantitatively prove sufficient cheating after the fact, that no viable legal remedy was available, that procedural hurdles (like laches) precluded consideration of the case on the merits or that the Supreme Court didn't want to inject itself into a political question.

Or members of the Supreme Court are threatened, compromised or craven. I can see the Texas case tossed out but the remaining ones will tell for sure.