Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/10/2020 9:30:23 PM PST by xomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: xomething

WOW!

And to think that the Donks settled for ole’ gropin’ Joe.


2 posted on 12/10/2020 9:38:27 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething
TULSI HAS NO QUALMS ABOUT KILLING THE 99.9% THAT ARE ABORTED!

CORRECTION…
TULSI GABBARD believes it is moral to murder 99.9% of the 1.6 million babies aborted in America each year.

3 posted on 12/10/2020 9:39:24 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. (Psalm 33:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething

Is she still a Hare Krishna follower?


5 posted on 12/10/2020 9:43:09 PM PST by rfp1234 (Caveat Emperor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething

So...it’s okay to kill the baby. But if it survives the attempt to do so, then it’s okay to try to save it. How do Rats live with the cacophony of noise that goes on in their minds?


6 posted on 12/10/2020 9:44:31 PM PST by bluejean (Living one day at a time in the national psych ward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething

About the only Democrat that I can respect.


11 posted on 12/10/2020 10:18:33 PM PST by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething
“I do, however, think that there should be some restrictions in place,” she said. “I support codifying Roe v. Wade — while making sure that, during the third trimester, abortion is not an option unless the life or severe health consequences of a woman are at risk.”

There is no risk to the mother situation that requires an abortion of a baby that old over a early delivery.

If the baby must come out to save the mother’s life, it DOES NOT need to be killed to accomplish that purpose.

15 posted on 12/10/2020 10:43:02 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething
at times Gabbard has held a 100 percent pro-abortion voting record

Why should we think she's changed?

16 posted on 12/10/2020 10:47:36 PM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething

I think that Tulsi Gabbard is a democrat that i can agree to disagree with. Not like the current crop of goose stepping fascist totalitarians. The democrats should have run her in 2020 instead of the dottering fool they’re trying to install. They’d have been able to actually win the election rather than break their cheating system trying to overcome a landslide.


17 posted on 12/11/2020 12:31:37 AM PST by Samurai_Jack (Democrats are not the enemy, Republicans are not your friends. We're on our own folks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething
Tulsi is busy:


19 posted on 12/11/2020 1:43:46 AM PST by sockmonkey (Conservative. Not a Neocon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething

She wants to protect babies. No wonder the raging feminazis hate her.


20 posted on 12/11/2020 3:59:16 AM PST by I want the USA back (I fear my government much much more than a virus from china.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xomething

Proof that not all liberals are social justice jihadis


23 posted on 12/12/2020 9:35:45 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson