Battle Between the CIA and DoD?

The New American ^ | December 8, 2020 | Daniel Natal

[bert]

I will argue that the establishment of many threads is not to inform but to speculate and to speculate about speculation.

[ransomnote]

Below is the computer generated transcript of the video for those who prefer to read it.

 

headed up by a man whose preferred

pronouns are freedom and liberty

this is the daniel natal show

 

election is exposing the seedy

underbelly of our political system

 

if anything it's good for disclosing how

much corruption we've hitherto been

living with well before the period of

president trump

 

in our last episode we found out about

national security action memorandum 57

which was created by president kennedy

to cut the cia out of power and to

transfer their special ops capabilities

to the department of defense which is

directly under presidential control

 

this order an sam 57 sidelines the cia

and limits them to being paper pushers

as we found out an sam 57 was never

implemented due to kennedy's

assassination

even though it was still on the books

presidents for decades were afraid to

invoke it

they didn't dare lift a hand toward the

cia after almost 60 years

trump just triggered it the fallout has

been monumental

with director of cia gina haspel iced

out of intelligence meetings

the war between the department of

defense and the cia may have just

intensified if one sets any store by the

testimony of lieutenant general thomas

mcinerney who said according to his

sources

a server farm in frankfurt germany was

seized by the department of defense that

was being run by the cia

and this all had to do with the rigging

of the election

the u.s army's the u.s special forces

command

seized a server farm

in frankfort germany because they were

sending this data

from those five states or six states

through the internet

to spain and then into frankfort germany

special operation forces seize

those that facility so they have those

servers

and they know all this data they are

provided

did that go down without incident by the

way did that seizure go down without

incident

well i've heard it uh it didn't go down

without incident

i haven't been able to verify it i want

to be careful in that

it's just coming out but i understand

my initial report is that there were

u.s soldiers killed in that operation

now that was a cia operation

and so that's the that's the very

worrisome thing

so did the cia have anything to do with

the let's just say

election irregularities that have

statisticians scratching their heads

more importantly is the sort of

bureaucratic civil war taking place

behind the scenes between the department

of defense and the cia

remember an sam 57 gives the cia's

powers to the dod

if the two were really duking it out in

frankfurt germany that could signal huge

things happening behind the scenes

the suggestion would be that the cia

practiced at rigging elections all over

the world for more than half a century

has decided to try their hand at doing

it in the united states and that there

are patriot forces now pushing back

while waiting for additional

confirmation other than lieutenant

general mcinerney for this internal

power struggle

it is suggested that the president just

appointed two loyalists

corey lewandowski and david bossie to

positions on the defense business board

according to one article quote the role

of the defense business board which was

established

in 2002 is to provide the secretary of

defense and deputy secretary of defense

with independent advice and

recommendations on

overall defense department management so

trump is placing loyalists and key

positions in the dod hierarchy while at

the same time freezing out the cia

we keep hearing accounts too of chinese

interference in the election but here's

the thing

the cia may be using china as a platform

a base of operations

though many people aren't aware of this

the cia actually has its roots in china

to understand this it might bear going

back in history a bit

this history lesson begins with the

1700s when england was making a fortune

selling tea

to buy it required sending gold to india

this caused the treasury in england to

become depleted

this created what's known in economics

as a balance of trade problem

so much gold was flowing out of england

to india that they didn't have enough on

hand back home in england to do

transactions

they desperately needed to replenish the

coffers so what to do

they eventually hit on the idea of

selling drugs to china to replenish the

gold that was flowing out to india

thus began the famous british drug trade

in china that funded the bank of england

of course the chinese resisted this they

didn't like the opium dens and dying

addicts so they outlawed opium

but the english defeated them in a

series of wars and imposed the

humiliating treaty of nanking in 1842

from their bases in shanghai and hong

kong the british would continue to sell

smack in china

both senator john kerry's family and the

roosevelts made their money in the opium

trade in china

burton folsom jr writes about how fdr's

grandfather warned delano had financial

losses in america and went to china to

rebuild his finances selling opium we

find written in folsom's book quote

on his mother's side his grandfather

warren delano made his money selling

opium illegally to chinese addicts

quote i don't pretend to justify the

opium trade in a moral and philanthropic

point of view delano said

but he persisted in it even when china

declared a war to stop

it when delano finally retired to his

mansion in new york

his legitimate business investments

there seemed to have done no better than

james roosevelt's

strapped for cash delano went back to

the opium trade and sarah spent several

of her youthful years in china as her

father rebuilt his finances

reading a totally different book on the

founder of the military industrial

complex veniver bush

we find a reference to another roosevelt

quote i knew that you couldn't get

anything done unless you organized under

the wing of the president wrote bush in

may 1940

bush asked frederick delano roosevelt's

uncle to arrange an appointment with the

white house

a frederick delano it adds delano kept

diverse company he mixed with scientists

architects and businessmen while finding

time to investigate the opium

trade in persia and mayan ruins in the

yucatan peninsula

the opium trade in persia so like his

father warned frederick was

investigating drug corridors

i do like though how the author g pascal

zachary makes it sound like an

intellectual pursuit

but basically all these people who are

presented to us as respectable are the

equivalent of colombian drug kingpin

pablo escobar

i was reading at another book about 19th

century financier jay gould and it

mentioned john murray forbes the great

grandfather of democrat john forbes

carey

in a biography on him we read quote

major financial losses during the panic

of 1837

caused him to sail for china once again

where he played a prominent role in the

opium wars

of course everybody knows that the

british banking system as we know today

was built on the proceeds of the drug

war in china

an hsbc bank is no exception their

initial stand for the hong kong shanghai

bank

by the way they were busted for

laundering money for drug cartels not

too long ago

and hsbc also appears to be the owner of

dominion voting software that is at the

heart of the current disputed election

by the way fbi hatchet man james comey

after letting hsbc walk on its money

laundering charges

was later appointed to sit on its board

of directors so it gets interesting that

when researching the origin of the cia

it too like hsbc was founded in shanghai

the cia started out as a sprout rooted

in the insurance giant aig which was

founded by cornelius vanderstar in

shanghai

right at the hub of the opium corridor

in china vanderstar would later run the

oss during world war ii

and created the cia the la times had an

interesting article on how aig morphed

into the cia with their article

secret insurance agents on vanderstar's

wikipedia page they quote from the

article

quote they knew which factories to burn

which bridges to blow up which cargo

ships could be sunk in good conscience

they had pothole counts for roads used

for invasion and headcounts for city

blocks marked for incineration

they weren't just secret agents they

were secret insurance agents

these undercover underwriters gave their

world war ii spymasters access to a

global industry that both bankrolled and

ultimately helped bring down

adolf hitler's third reich newly

declassified u.s intelligence

files tell the remarkable story of the

ultra-secret insurance intelligence unit

a component of the office of strategic

services a forerunner of the cia

and its elite counter intelligence

branch x2

long story short whenever you read china

think cia drug front whenever you see

the fbi's james comey on the board of

directors of hsbc

know what that means china for lack of a

better word

is a sort of shell company a front

china's interference in our election is

really a roundabout way of saying the

cia's running operations out of shanghai

note how everywhere there's a central

bank there's an intelligence agency to

enforce their will

they're at secret police it's gestapo

it's no coincidence that the london

central banking system and the cia both

got their start in shanghai

the cia does not serve our interests it

serves

their interests remember when the cia

overthrew iran in 1953 to help british

petroleum

ask yourself why an american

intelligence agency was doing the

bidding of a british corporation

answer the cia is the secret police of

the british banks

it is not american it was never american

it was installed in the united states to

ensure that the policies of the global

central bankers were carried out

and donald j trump's push to place

america first doesn't exactly coincide

with their interests people fear any

political leader who has his finger on

the red button

what political leaders fear is people

having their finger on the red button