Me too. Some apparently have forgotten 2000 when the USSC intervened for far less (hanging chads in one country) in Florida.
I don't see how the USSC can refuse to take the case up and then rule in President Trump's favor. Four states (MI, WI, PA, GA) blatantly violated their own states Constitutions and if past rulings are any indicator, that's NOT something the USSC looks favorably upon.
I'm just glad Roberts cannot re-write this whole mess as a "tax."
And, Texas expressly cites a case in which the Court DID in fact, nullify a states electors. Admittedly, Id have to look back at the brief, but Texas does cite a case so there is precedent. The argument, again, of standing or lack of, is a red herring.