Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/10/2020 12:52:39 PM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: tarpit

https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html


2 posted on 12/10/2020 12:54:20 PM PST by TNoldman (AN AMERICAN FOR A MUSLIM/BHO FREE AMERICA. (Owner of Stars and Bars Flags))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit
According to this, 20 states are in support of Texas.

That's nearly half.

5 posted on 12/10/2020 12:56:38 PM PST by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Bfl


6 posted on 12/10/2020 12:57:43 PM PST by goodnesswins (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." -- Saul Alinksy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Thank you. Seems like it keeps growing/changing by the minute.


7 posted on 12/10/2020 12:57:49 PM PST by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Ohio’s cracks me up

“in support of nobody”


9 posted on 12/10/2020 12:58:14 PM PST by RummyChick (I blame Kushner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

democrat states:

states’ rights! states’ rights! states’ rights!

lol


10 posted on 12/10/2020 12:59:08 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

JUST IN - 106 Republican House members just filed an amicus brief in support of Texas' bid to overturn Biden's win in the Supreme Court.— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 10, 2020


11 posted on 12/10/2020 1:01:49 PM PST by BusterDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Quote from movie “The Hunt for Red October”. Seems to apply here: “This business will get out of control! It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it!”


12 posted on 12/10/2020 1:02:33 PM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

I am OD’d on legal crap. Can’t take no more. Goodnight.


17 posted on 12/10/2020 1:06:18 PM PST by Eleutheria5 ("The impossible happens all the time. You just have to believe." Will Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Soros puppets:

XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General
State of California

PHILIP J. WEISER
Attorney General
State of Colorado

WILLIAM TONG
Attorney General
State of Connecticut

KATHLEEN JENNINGS
Attorney General
State of Delaware

LEEVIN TAITANO CAMACHO
Attorney General
Territory of Guam

CLARE E. CONNORS
Attorney General
State of Hawaii

KWAME RAOUL
Attorney General
State of Illinois

AARON M. FREY
Attorney General
State of Maine

BRIAN E. FROSH
Attorney General
State of Maryland

MAURA HEALEY
Attorney General
Commonwealth of Massachusetts

KEITH ELLISON
Attorney General
State of Minnesota

AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
State of Nevada

GURBIR S. GREWAL
Attorney General
State of New Jersey

HECTOR BALDERAS
Attorney General
State of New Mexico

LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General
State of New York

JOSHUA H. STEIN
Attorney General
State of North Carolina

ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM
Attorney General
State of Oregon

PETER F. NERONHA
Attorney General
State of Rhode Island

THOMAS J. DONOVAN, JR.
Attorney General
State of Vermont

MARK R. HERRING
Attorney General
Commonwealth of Virginia

DENISE N. GEORGE
Attorney General
U.S. Virgin Islands

ROBERT W. FERGUSON
Attorney General
State of Washington

Source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163379/20201210144443769_Texas%20v.%20Pennsylvania%20-%20Motion%20and%20Br.%20of%20Amici%20DC%20et%20al.pdf


20 posted on 12/10/2020 1:07:33 PM PST by upchuck (When Democrats cheat in front of the whole world, what do you think they will do behind your back?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

After reading some of these arguments, something to note stands out...

Arguments to dismiss seem to rely on the premise that claims of fraud are baseless and unproven. (because the lower courts wouldn’t hear them)

So... i’m anticipating or speculating that SCOTUS will zero in on that first... Are claims of fraud that would impact the result baseless or not?

seems to me that if significant fraud CAN be proven, then the defendants do not have a defense.


29 posted on 12/10/2020 1:13:18 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

This is probably the key filing from PA:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163367/20201210142206254_Pennsylvania%20Opp%20to%20Bill%20of%20Complaint%20v.FINAL.pdf

They say, among other things, Texas has no standing, etc..

IV.Texas is Not Entitled to the Extraordinary
Preliminary Injunction it Seeks
............................
27A. Texas cannot meet the high standard for
injunctive relief
................................
.................
27B. Texas’s request to disenfranchise tens of
millions of voters who reasonably relied upon
the law at the time of the election does great damage to the public interest
..........................
___________________________________________

PA makes no mention or concern about disenfranchising millions of Republican voters via illegal changes to voting procedures...

Any other opinions of people here who have a legal background?


33 posted on 12/10/2020 1:16:58 PM PST by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit
I waited to post this list thinking I had them all, but here is another one in support of plaintiff.

Movants, who are elected and sitting Senators and Representatives of the State of Alaska, State of Arizona, and State of Idaho, and the sitting Lieutenant Governor of the State of Idaho. source

39 posted on 12/10/2020 1:20:07 PM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Jonathan Turley (Constitutional Scholar) says SCOTUS not likely to take it up.


47 posted on 12/10/2020 1:26:06 PM PST by evangmlw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Thank you for your work on this.


49 posted on 12/10/2020 1:29:28 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Thanks tarpit for being so diligent in presenting these cases in such a timely manner.

I just finished the PA response.

This MANDATORY SIGNATURE VERIFICATION statement by PA is the most unsettling to me:

“”””First, Texas asserts that the Secretary “abrogated”
the mandatory signature verification requirement for
absentee or mail-in ballots. Bill of Complaint at 14-15.
This is untrue. See In re Nov. 3, 2020 Election, 240 A.3d
591, 610 (Pa. 2020) (Election Code does not authorize
county election boards to reject mail-in ballots based on
an analysis of a voter’s signature. “[A]t no time did the
Code provide for challenges to ballot signatures.”). Far
from usurping any legislative authority, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused “to rewrite a statute in
order to supply terms which [we]re not present
4
therein.” Id. at 14. A federal judge reached the same
result. See In Donald Trump for President, Inc. v.
Boockvar, 2020 WL 5997680, at *58 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 10,
2020) (“[T]he Election Code does not impose a signature-comparison requirement for mail-in and absentee
ballots.”).”””

If that statement is anywhere near to being true, then why should any state have any rules regarding elections?

Under PA’s line of reasoning, an election in Pennsylvania is no more valid than a bunch of FReepers responding to a ‘poll on the internet’.


54 posted on 12/10/2020 1:32:26 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit
Thanks for posting the list. Ohio's is good, they see the merits of the case and want the court to take it up and rule on it. They don't support either party but they want a decision.
64 posted on 12/10/2020 1:46:27 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

Thank you for putting this post together. Your efforts are appreciated.


66 posted on 12/10/2020 1:48:22 PM PST by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit

The battle lines are drawn.


70 posted on 12/10/2020 1:53:55 PM PST by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tarpit
The city of Detroit has now filed. source

Plaintiff makes very few “factual” allegations relating to Michigan, with all allegations of supposed fraud arising from debunked claims about the processing and tabulation of absent voter ballots by the City of Detroit (the “City”) in Hall E of the TCF Center, a convention center in downtown Detroit.

76 posted on 12/10/2020 1:56:19 PM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson