Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Responds After Nevada Supreme Court Rejects Lawsuit: ‘We Were Not Afforded an Opportunity to Write Our Brief or Argue the Case in Front of the Court’
Epoch Times ^ | 12/09/2020 | Jack Phillips

Posted on 12/09/2020 7:50:35 PM PST by SeekAndFind

The Nevada Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s appeal on Tuesday to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election.

It comes a week after a district court in Nevada ruled that the Trump campaign has not proven allegations there were errors in voting machines or that the contest between Trump and Democrat Joe Biden was manipulated.

“We also are not convinced that the district court erred in applying a burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence, as supported by the cases cited in the district court’s order,” Nevada’s Supreme Court said in its judgment (pdf) late on Tuesday.

The ruling added: “And, in any event, the district court further determined that appellants had not met their burden even if it applied a lesser standard. Finally, the district court’s order thoroughly addressed the grounds asserted in the statement of contest filed by appellants and considered the evidence offered by appellants even when that evidence did not meet the requirements under Nevada law for expert testimony.”

Following the ruling, Nevada’s GOP said it was disappointed by the decision.

“We were not afforded an opportunity to write our brief or argue the case in front of the court,” Nevada’s GOP wrote in a statement. “Full denial of legitimate due process and appellate rights is truly unprecedented, shocking, and extraordinary.”

The GOP further said that the state Supreme Court “rushed to judgment” in rendering its decision, saying that the team also “presented compelling evidence in court last week” that the district court last week “quickly shrugged” off “and rubber-stamped the fraudulent result without due consideration or even hearing directly from witnesses.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: gop; lawsuit; nevada; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
The Trump lawsuit originally said that more than 60,000 people voted twice or were not Nevada residents.

Last week, Jesse Binnall, who presented the evidence on behalf of the Trump campaign, included a witness who alleged that the memory disks used to store vote totals from election machines during the early vote period had the vote tallies inexplicably changed overnight.

HOW THE HECK DID THE NV SUPREME COURT MAKE THIS DECISION WITHOUT EVEN LOOKING AT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED?

1 posted on 12/09/2020 7:50:35 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s Vegas what happens there especially incriminating judicial stuff usually stays there if things happen


2 posted on 12/09/2020 7:51:36 PM PST by Lod881019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Chinese payoffs are everywhere it seems. We are under invasion.


3 posted on 12/09/2020 7:51:47 PM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
HOW THE HECK DID THE NV SUPREME COURT MAKE THIS DECISION WITHOUT EVEN LOOKING AT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED?

To each of the judges: "Toss this suit immediately or we will publish the pics of you with those naked boys."

4 posted on 12/09/2020 7:54:05 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The key word is’Alleged’. Did Trump’s attorney have the memory disks physically?


5 posted on 12/09/2020 7:57:06 PM PST by White Lives Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"HOW THE HECK DID THE NV SUPREME COURT MAKE THIS DECISION WITHOUT EVEN LOOKING AT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED? "

The democrat party of organized crime.
6 posted on 12/09/2020 7:57:08 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“ We were not afforded an opportunity to write our brief or argue the case in front of the court,” Nevada’s GOP wrote in a statement”

The Appellants, in fact, filed a 40 page brief: http://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseView.do?csIID=60454
(See document 20-44708)


7 posted on 12/09/2020 8:08:30 PM PST by thegagline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Those 60k actors should have been arrested.

Arrest records would assist in the case.

8 posted on 12/09/2020 8:10:14 PM PST by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be takfor sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

That’s not the one they’re talking about...

Why would the lawyers say they didn’t have an opportunity to file a brief if they had filed a brief?


9 posted on 12/09/2020 8:14:07 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred

Yep. Did you read the one article today about the audio tape of the Chinese guy bragging that they successfully infiltrated the US Government? This is a take over of our country by a hostile foreign government and nobody seems to be doing anything about it. Trump needs to declare a national emergency , declare martial law and arrest all traitors involved.


10 posted on 12/09/2020 8:14:34 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Probably a faux pas; likely meant “read our brief” since not being allowed to “write” wouldn’t make sense in that context. Short of stealing pens and pencils it’d be hard to prevent someone from writing.


11 posted on 12/09/2020 8:15:37 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

Arrested by who? the FBI ? They should be, but won’t be.


12 posted on 12/09/2020 8:19:36 PM PST by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Crime okay in Nevada.


13 posted on 12/09/2020 8:21:38 PM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Judicial malfeasance bordering on a criminal conspiracy to thwart legitimate moral adjudication based upon clear physical evidence of criminal activity.


14 posted on 12/09/2020 8:22:35 PM PST by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch (Clean out the DOJ, CIA & FBI, top-to-bottom, Barr, Haspel & Wray first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, hell, they are revising the definitions of words all over the place to suit their political ends, so why not “evidence” too?


15 posted on 12/09/2020 8:24:55 PM PST by cld51860 (Volo pro veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anyone witnessing these “JUDGES” being taken out and SHOT DOWN LIKE DOGS might not feel too guilty in being very slow to intervene against such a patriotic effort.......


16 posted on 12/09/2020 8:25:56 PM PST by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch (Clean out the DOJ, CIA & FBI, top-to-bottom, Barr, Haspel & Wray first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“ That’s not the one they’re talking about...”

Actually, it is. There was only one case that was decided on Tuesday in Nevada regarding the election : “ LAW VS. WHITMER (BALLOT ISSUE)” case numner : 82178

Please give me citation to the case you think that the article is referring to that was decided on December 8. I look forward to your response.


17 posted on 12/09/2020 8:34:08 PM PST by thegagline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It's as many of us suspected; Deep State has blackmail information on many judges and politicians; left and right.

Even left-wing judges won't make a blatantly stupid or corrupt decision - unless they are forced to.
18 posted on 12/09/2020 8:34:52 PM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred

Yep this is years in the making. Infiltration at work for all areas of western civilization. Straight from the communist manifesto. And people will still think that is a kook theory. Now we are seeing it so clearly in the courts. Lawless judges who work only for their masters.


19 posted on 12/09/2020 8:42:42 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Jail for criminal judges; those who operate outside of the written law. Hanging for judges who commit treason.


20 posted on 12/09/2020 8:47:07 PM PST by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam; USgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson