Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Presbyterian Reporter

I dont believe SCOTUS will rule that way. I am not even expecting them to allow the plaintiff to continue.

Maybe I will be pleasantly surprised.


95 posted on 12/09/2020 3:10:10 PM PST by RummyChick (I blame Kushner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

“””I dont believe SCOTUS will rule that way. I am not even expecting them to allow the plaintiff to continue.”””


Thank you for challenging my assumptions. Upon further review, this is what I believe will happen.

1. SCOTUS will tell the political parties. Quit bringing your political disagreements to the court. Our forefathers gave us a Constitution more than 200 years ago that clearly spelled out the rules for conducting elections.

2. First Constitutional rule. If a State Legislature does not agree with the popular vote in their state, they have the power to override the popular vote by selecting their own electors.

3. Second Constitutional rule. If the US House of Representatives does not agree with the Electoral College vote, the House of Representatives can override the Electoral College and select their own President.

And if I were SCOTUS I would also say. “Political parties, we live in 2020 and there is no excuse for illegal voting as we have more computer power than ever to detect and prevent illegal voters. Just do it!!!”


120 posted on 12/09/2020 4:20:22 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson