Unfortunately, your main point here is totally irrelevant to the case under discussion.
When and if some kind of unspecified "somethings" should have been done simply avoids the central issue.
Grave--perhaps fatal-- injuries to the electorial process have been perpetrated by different agencies and on different legislative venues. The very heart and soul of representative government is under attack by Democrat fraudsters attempting to break our Constitutional system.
The very essence and existential reason for a Supreme Court lies in this kind of case--an attack on the Executive Branch. Of all cases this Court may address, this one will be the most crucial--a case that can be handled only by the Supreme Court of the Nation.
The Supreme Court must--and will-take this crucial case and must--and will--find for the representative of the Executive Branch now undergoing an unlawful assault.
Joe Biden will be forced to limp away into political obscurity and President Trump will remain at home in the Executive Mansion for four more glorious years.
I thought something was done months earlier and Roberts blocked it, and he blocked it twice. Thomas said that SCOTUS should have heard it before votes were cast because it becomes much more difficult after votes are cast, but Roberts would have none of it.
So, SCOTUS refuses to hear before the election, and then punts afterwards saying they should have acted before the election?
-PJ
There were plenty of court cases prior to the election. Months of court cases. A summary of where some of those cases stood in October: https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-virus-outbreak-voting-1c9d23ce9ff7d3b81d41874bfb49b637
Well stated. I agree.
Trump and Barr saw this coming and talked about it publicly continually for months before it happened. The pending Mail In Ballot fiasco. Nobody did anything to prevent this from happening including Trump and Barr. No courts cases. NADA The Supreme Court will not take up this case because something should have done months earlier. All of the guests on Hannity today agreed the Supreme Court will punt. Case Closed. Biden Wins.
Trump is a very smart man, but how would he know, “months before it happened” that the 4 states being sued are out of 50 to choose from, the 4 that would commit blatant election fraud?
All of the guests on Vannity have no clue what the court will do. I believe that fear of ‘packing the court’, as biden suggests, will give the Supremes’ pause.
If biden ‘wins’, the court will become irrelevant, along with the Constitution.
The Constitutionalists on the court will not be enablers and allow the Country to go down the tubes...Not ‘On their watch.’
You just don’t understand how things work.....sorry but that’s just why you get your pants in a knot.
They DID do something. I remember months earlier Mark Levin caught wind of one of the changes in Michigan or Penn and was talking with that states legislature and lawyers on air about it...they were suing left and right to try to reverse those changes.
That is a valid concern.
However, it ignores one critical issue.
Texas opens by directly citing Republican Party v Boockvar -- which is also pending in SCOTUS -- and that opening citation was no accident.
Republican Party PA is the case where PA directly disobeyed an Emergency Order by Justice Alito to segregate ballots. Alito is not going to allow that to pass unaddressed.
* "That all ballots received by mail after 8:00 p.m. on November 3 be segregated and kept “in a secure, safe and sealed container separate from other voted ballots"