Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right2Rights

Well stated. I agree.


160 posted on 12/09/2020 6:15:01 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: nwrep; Right2Rights
The problem with Trump/Barr trying to intervene prior to the election, is that any claim before SCOTUS would NOT be seen as ripe.

SCOTUS would not have even put any such motion, or complaint, on the docket...much less ruled on it.

Prior to the election, any such complaints about fraud wouldn't even be "ripe" within a state's judicial system as the election would not have taken place yet.

The best bet, prior to the election, would have been for plaintiff's within the state (Attorney General's for example) to argue before their state courts/supreme courts, that their respective states legislatures jurisdiction/power to make state election laws were being violated by their Secretaries of State.

Unfortunately, we've gotten an idea on how some of those states judiciaries would rule.

It's really quite the cluster F$#* our country has allowed to fester.

165 posted on 12/09/2020 6:30:36 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

Well YOU would....heck it’s raining wherever you land on the threads!


189 posted on 12/09/2020 8:06:57 PM PST by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson