[White Lives Matter]

Most excellent. Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.

[dragnet2]

So the “Great One” Mark Levin is now just the “Mediocre” one.

[DesertRhino]

“Most excellent. Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.”

So, we need to be more violent in the streets to get a fair hearing?
Noted...

[AFB-XYZ]

Most excellent. Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.

1. Levin is tremendous, but not infallible; and

2. Maybe some of the Supremes have gotten a clue of what civil unrest could REALLY look like.

Fingers crossed. Prayers up, and up, and up.

[MayflowerMadam]

“Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.”

Doesn’t SCOTUS get that there’ll be civil unrest either way? WE have had ENOUGH, and we won’t stand for having a president who didn’t win the election.

[Osage Orange]

Well...they and a lot of Pols ought to consider what has actually happened here.

We are not deaf..nor dumb or blind.

They better listen and read what we are saying.....

I'm pretty much mad as hell and ain't going to take anymore..............

[CottonBall]

“ Most excellent. Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.”

i find it hard to believe Levine thinks the SC will let something unconstitutional stand because of fear.

[tired&retired]

They will have civil unrest either way.

[Fledermaus]

I read that he was referring only to the PA lawsuit by Trump not this one filed by TX.