Posted on 12/04/2020 6:16:35 PM PST by Right2Rights
Her larger point is that there is no Safe Harbor on Dec. 8th because the disputes were not addressed before that date, just a rush to certify fraud.
Sidney looks much more rested and calm in this interview.
That is good.
Will be curious to see what all these shredded ballots are.
The “safe harbor” deadline (Dec. 8) that frees a state from further challenge IF it resolves all disputes and certifies its voting results. There are still disputes ongoing.
The problem isn’t the evidence...it’s getting people who are willing to hear the evidence....you’re not helping.
Powell “...these are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of this election due to this fraud at anytime.”
Start from the video at 6:58;
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/election-2020-powell-trump-wisconsin/2020/12/04/id/1000147/
Powell “Well actually with the fraud case the December 8th deadline doesn’t apply. We have until at least December 14. We might file more suits but a court in Michigan or Wisconsin today just gave us a great order recognizing that”.
Powell “These are not pure election contest that we are filing, these are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of this election due to this fraud at anytime. And the states should not be certifying the election results in the face of it”.
Agreed. My eyes have been really opened to this fact. It used to be my safe haven of Conservatism. Now all this defeatism just turns my stomach.
The fraud is so overwhelming and obvious it makes me wonder if the Chine and see eye ay planned it so the chaos would multiply exponentially in America. What ‘mischief’ has China and Iran up their cabalish sleezes?
really? TRUMP ballots in a river? Oh my goodness. I didn’t hear that...
Sigh... this is horrible. Just horrible.
God help us!!
While I do appreciate that Sydney Powell is very serious about getting things right, I do not think her choice of focus is helpful. Nor do I think I would do better than her in her place. I would do worse than she would. At least she is an experienced high level lawyer. However she is NOT an experienced election lawyer and it is hurting her and the cause since there are lawyers way better at election law, such as Robert Barnes, that she is not listening too and she should...especially when they advice her what to focus on and what NOT to focus on.
I completely believe there is fraud. The video yesterday solidified that. Why doesn’t Sidney show the shredded ballots - a picture or a video?
It is Sidney. Pay attention.
Sidney and Rudy has been showing solid evidence all week. And TONS of video and other evidence is all over the internet. Saying someone needs to show ‘us’ more are the same ones who are denying their own eyes.
You’re wrong, she spells her name Sidney, not Sydney.
I am convinced there is evidence. I am convinced there is fraud. They don't need to show 'us' more. They need to show those that are not convinced. Pile it on. Show the bag of shredded ballots. That cat is out of the bag now.
A few days ago I thought it was best to keep these things under wraps until they were presented in court. No more. Pressure needs to come from every freedom loving American to every politician and every jurist.
I’d never heard of her before 2-3 weeks ago, whenever she appeared in the middle of this, but from all I’ve heard, she is brilliant. Maybe she and Lin are playing dumb to get as many people as possible pulled into the coup. Then, pull out undeniable proof. Or maybe not. It won’t matter anyway. There is going to be extreme violence.
That’s one reason why Team Trump decided not to work with them
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.