Replies

“At what point do the Republican Secretaries of State and Attorneys General in the states that POTUS won, file federal law suits presenting the cumulative evidence of fraud across the various contested states as violations of the 14th Amendment, and dilution and disenfranchisement of their citizens? Why not now and why not give it a try?

They can't because the presidential election is really 51 different elections in the states and D.C. The deprivation of rights is to the candidate, his electors, and his voters in places were the fraud occured on a scale to affect the election result. Those in other states have no rights, and therefore no remedy, other than when the votes are counted by a joint session of Congress in January.

Appreciate your response.

I guess I was under the misguided notion that since SCOTUS stepped in for FL 2000 (a single state, why a federal issue?), under the 14th (”No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States...”) that this would be entirely applicable in a situation where we have multiple states (thus, a federal issue?) in question. If FL could not guarantee its citizens equal protection in 2000, why does this not apply now across state lines? Furthermore, it’d seem that voting by absentee ballots vs. mail-ins vs. in person with varying degrees of authentication (to the extent any exists) across a single state would be violations of the 14th.

Just saying; thanks again.