Replies

I’d be interested in your thoughts on the following - which I’ve posted on some other threads. TIA.

It’d seem to me that: (1) this would be one way to fast track the situation to SCOTUS (2) present all the evidence gathered by Giuliani, Powell and others (3) that the issue of standing will be moot (4) given certifications of the vote in the contested states, that the matter will be ripe, and (5) create a federal case that can be subjected to further investigation.”

I think it’s probably a more viable path than one directed at the state legislatures. The outcome of the case, however, could provide the impetus for the legislatures to do their constitutional duty.

“At what point do the Republican Secretaries of State and Attorneys General in the states that POTUS won, file federal law suits presenting the cumulative evidence of fraud across the various contested states as violations of the 14th Amendment, and dilution and disenfranchisement of their citizens? Why not now and why not give it a try?

They can't because the presidential election is really 51 different elections in the states and D.C. The deprivation of rights is to the candidate, his electors, and his voters in places were the fraud occured on a scale to affect the election result. Those in other states have no rights, and therefore no remedy, other than when the votes are counted by a joint session of Congress in January.