Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election Crisis Update [Weekly Update]
Judicial Watch ^ | December 4, 2020 | Tom Fitton

Posted on 12/04/2020 4:55:58 PM PST by jazusamo

President Trump Echoes Judicial Watch Concerns about Dirty Voter Rolls
Records Show Obama DHS Scanned Georgia Election Site in 2016
Three Congresswomen Star in Forum with Terror Financiers, Anti-Semites

President Trump Echoes Judicial Watch Concerns about Dirty Voter Rolls

In his forceful and comprehensive address to the nation this week on widespread election fraud, the president referred to the many dirty voter rolls across the country. Here’s what he said:

It’s a widely known fact that the voting rolls are packed with people who are not lawfully eligible to vote, including those who are deceased, have moved out of their state, and even our non-citizens of our country.

Beyond this, the records are riddled with errors, wrong addresses, duplicate entries, and many other issues. This is not disputed. It has never been disputed. Dozens of counties in the key swing states have more registered voters on the rolls than they have voting age citizens, including 67 counties in Michigan. All of this is evidence.

In Wisconsin, the state’s Board of Elections could not confirm the residency of more than 100,000 people, but repeatedly refused to remove those names from its voter rolls before the election. They knew why, nobody else did. I knew why. They were illegal voters. It is a travesty that in the year 2020, we do not have any means of verifying the eligibility of those who cast ballots in an election and such an important election it is, or determining who they are, whether they live in the state or whether they’re even American citizens. We have no idea.

[You can watch his speech here. And here is a transcript .]

You might have recognized his concerns about dirty voting rolls because Judicial Watch in October reported that our September 2020 study revealed 353 U.S. counties with 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens. In other words, the registration rates of those counties exceeded 100% of eligible voters. The study found eight states showing statewide registration rates exceeding 100%: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

I’ve repeatedly said that dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections. That’s why we’ve filed three federal lawsuits to clean up the voter rolls in Pennsylvania (which our lawsuit alleges has over 800,000 extra names on the rolls), North Carolina and Colorado.

Our expert team of election lawyers and investigators is also on top of the current election crisis. For example, we have dozens of open record requests in the battleground states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada – to start.

The Left changed how our elections were conducted – and it resulted in a tsunami of mail-in ballots that the evidence increasingly shows were unlawfully handled and counted in a way at that is at odds with the law. The structural integrity of the elections in key states fell under leftist machinations – raising serious question about the validity of reported results for Joe Biden.

There is strong evidence, incontrovertible is some instances, that virtually every “battleground” state’s laws were violated in the handling and counting of mail-in ballots. It is an open question whether the courts will enforce the rule of law. But under our Constitution, the state legislatures and Congress can and must act through the Electoral College process. Accordingly, I encourage you to contact your state legislatures (especially if you live in states where the election is under dispute) and Congress to let your elected representatives know what you think about the current election crisis.

President Trump, as president, has a constitutional duty to enforce the rule of law on election issues. And as the DOJ is seemingly again AWOL , it will be up to Judicial Watch and other independent activists and citizens like you to ensure that our elections are secure and that the lawful winner is our nation’s next president.

Records Show Obama DHS Scanned Georgia Election Site in 2016

Continued


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 2020election; antisemites; aoc; briankemp; dhs; georgia; hamas; judicialwatch; jw; mccollum; muslimbrotherhood; obama; terrorists; tlaib; tomfitton; trump; voterfraud; voterrolls; weeklyupdate

1 posted on 12/04/2020 4:55:58 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Diana in Wisconsin; ColdOne; Art in Idaho; Conservative Gato; ptsal; onyx; Tucker39; ...

Off the Wall Ping!

Contact to be added.


2 posted on 12/04/2020 5:01:02 PM PST by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The only hope is to get before the Supreme Court, and that would have to happen within the next few days.

What is the pathway to that? I don't see it happening. Can someone tell me?

3 posted on 12/05/2020 3:02:26 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Powell “...these are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of this election due to this fraud at anytime.”

Start from the video at 6:58;
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/election-2020-powell-trump-wisconsin/2020/12/04/id/1000147/

Powell “Well actually with the fraud case the December 8th deadline doesn’t apply. We have until at least December 14. We might file more suits but a court in Michigan or Wisconsin today just gave us a great order recognizing that”.

Powell “These are not pure election contest that we are filing, these are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of this election due to this fraud at anytime. And the states should not be certifying the election results in the face of it”.


4 posted on 12/05/2020 3:28:12 AM PST by Son House (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Another bit of information, I think it is a direct quote from Powell;
https://archive.org/stream/dominion-voting-systems-report-final-12-2-20.docx-1/Dominion%20Voting%20Systems%20Report%20final%2012-2-20.docx%20%281%29_djvu.txt

“During the 2020 election, Dominion voting machines were connected to the internet in
29 different states; anywhere these machines were connected to the internet, votes were being
watched in real time, and switched for Biden if President Trump was ahead.”


5 posted on 12/05/2020 3:35:04 AM PST by Son House (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
We have until at least December 14. We might file more suits but a court in Michigan or Wisconsin today just gave us a great order recognizing that”.

Actually, December 14th is way too late. The electors will vote that day, and even if we get a court date is must be several days before the 14th to allot time for hearing the evidence and for a court decision.

We are almost out of time.

6 posted on 12/05/2020 3:43:35 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson