And where did Edison get its voting data from?>>> The fastest and most complete vote results
Multiple sources allow Edison Research to provide faster reporting of vote data than any other organization.
https://www.edisonresearch.com/election-polling/#two
Second hand info. Could miss a feed at 12:00 A.m. could do a refresh at 3:00 a.m. I can see someone standing in front of the Judge wanting to throw out 300,000 votes based on the vote counts reflected on a web site that gets updates (maybe even very sophisticated updates at that) from actual data sources that are not certified by any election commission.
RE: Second hand info. Could miss a feed at 12:00 A.m. could do a refresh at 3:00 a.m. I can see someone standing in front of the Judge wanting to throw out 300,000 votes based on the vote counts reflected on a web site that gets updates (maybe even very sophisticated updates at that) from actual data sources that are not certified by any election commission.
I’m trying to understand what you’re trying to say here. You seem to be saying that the source, Edison Research does not feed data in real time and what you see at a certain instance could be DEALYED data from accumulated data that was missed in the past hours.
Hence, a plausible explanation for the sudden spike in batch of ballots that recorded some 570,000 votes for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Donald Trump ( 99.4 for Biden and just 0.6 percent for Trump ) is that the data for Biden was simply catching up from previously missed counting in the the previous hours?
In other words, what you’re saying is -— the notion that the sudden Biden lopsided spike was observed at say, 3:00 AM is not because of a sudden data dump from manipulated ballots but because Edison failed to provide the counts for Biden during the previous hours and only counted Trump’s and suddenly the Biden counts from the previous hours caught up?
I’m trying to make sense of this because it doesn’t make much sense to me as how this could happen. If it does, then Edison Research is all but useless when it comes to providing up to date voting data.