Pennsylvania Bombshell: Biden 99.4% v. Trump 0.6%. Stunning testimony that the media has dutifully ignored.

There are landslides and then there are landslides. There are lopsided votes and then there are lopsided votes. There are egregious examples of vote manipulation and then there are really egregious examples of vote manipulation. What surfaced during hearings in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 25, 2020, may set the standard for electoral outrageousness. An expert testifying to the Pennsylvania Senate flagged a batch of ballots that recorded some 570,000 votes for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Donald Trump.

Yes, you read that correctly. That would equate to Joe Biden bagging 99.4 percent of that enormous chunk of votes. That one batch alone would have flipped the state to Biden.

This bombshell was dropped last Wednesday at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg. The November 25 hearings, which began at 12:30 p.m. and ran for nearly four hours, were convened at the request of Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Adams, Cumberland, Franklin, and York counties). It was sponsored by the Senate Majority Policy Committee, chaired by Sen. David Argall (R-Berks/Schuylkill). Mastriano has called what happened “unacceptable,” and has called for the resignation of Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.

This particular gem was provided by Ret. Col. Phil Waldren, a former combat officer with a background in Army information and electronic warfare. Waldren, who testified along with Rudy Giuliani’s team, brought to the hearing his considerable expertise in analysis of election-data fraud. After Waldren presented his material, the chair opened the floor for questions. Rudy Giuliani went first, asking Waldren to clarify what his analytics team means when they talk about “spike anomalies” in voting patterns. These, as Waldren defines them, are “events where a numerical amount of votes are processed in a time period that is not feasible or mechanically possible under normal circumstances.”

In my opinion, either the state legislatures will withhold their electors and send it into the House for the GOP caucus to rectify, or we wait for Ft. Sumpter II. Those are pretty much our options. Supposedly conservative radio hosts can’t say that on air. The only recourse for rigged elections is revolution.

And where did Edison get its voting data from?>>> The fastest and most complete vote results
Multiple sources allow Edison Research to provide faster reporting of vote data than any other organization.
https://www.edisonresearch.com/election-polling/#two
Second hand info. Could miss a feed at 12:00 A.m. could do a refresh at 3:00 a.m. I can see someone standing in front of the Judge wanting to throw out 300,000 votes based on the vote counts reflected on a web site that gets updates (maybe even very sophisticated updates at that) from actual data sources that are not certified by any election commission.

RE: Second hand info. Could miss a feed at 12:00 A.m. could do a refresh at 3:00 a.m. I can see someone standing in front of the Judge wanting to throw out 300,000 votes based on the vote counts reflected on a web site that gets updates (maybe even very sophisticated updates at that) from actual data sources that are not certified by any election commission.

I’m trying to understand what you’re trying to say here. You seem to be saying that the source, Edison Research does not feed data in real time and what you see at a certain instance could be DEALYED data from accumulated data that was missed in the past hours.

Hence, a plausible explanation for the sudden spike in batch of ballots that recorded some 570,000 votes for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Donald Trump ( 99.4 for Biden and just 0.6 percent for Trump ) is that the data for Biden was simply catching up from previously missed counting in the the previous hours?

In other words, what you’re saying is -— the notion that the sudden Biden lopsided spike was observed at say, 3:00 AM is not because of a sudden data dump from manipulated ballots but because Edison failed to provide the counts for Biden during the previous hours and only counted Trump’s and suddenly the Biden counts from the previous hours caught up?

I’m trying to make sense of this because it doesn’t make much sense to me as how this could happen. If it does, then Edison Research is all but useless when it comes to providing up to date voting data.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.